Swanson H L, Sachse-Lee C
Educational Psychology, School of Education, University of California, Riverside 92521, USA.
J Learn Disabil. 2001 May-Jun;34(3):249-63. doi: 10.1177/002221940103400305.
The purpose of this study was to investigate whether changes in working memory (WM) of children with reading disabilities (RD) were related to a domain-specific or a domain-general system. Based on Daneman and Carpenter's (1980) Sentence Listening Span task, children were subgrouped into a group of high executive processing (high listening span) children without RD, a group of low executive processing (low listening span) children with RD, and a group of children with and without RD matched on executive processing (moderate listening span). Subgroups were compared on phonological, visual-spatial, and semantic WM tasks across initial (no probes or cues), gain (cues that bring performance to an asymptotic level), and maintenance conditions (asymptotic conditions without cues). The results showed that (a) children without RD high in executive processing ability outperformed all other subgroups, (b) the RD subgroup low in executive processing performed poorly relative to all other subgroups across task and memory conditions, (c) children with and without RD matched on executive processing were comparable in WM span and changes in WM for all tasks, and (d) WM performance of children with RD was a strong linear function of the high executive processing group, suggesting that the nature or the specific componential makeup of the tasks are not the main contributors to WM performance. Taken together, the results suggest that a domain-general system may partially contribute to poor WM in children with RD, and that this system may operate independently of their reading deficits.
本研究的目的是调查阅读障碍(RD)儿童工作记忆(WM)的变化是否与特定领域或通用领域系统相关。基于丹曼和卡彭特(1980)的句子听力广度任务,儿童被分为三组:一组是没有阅读障碍的高执行加工(高听力广度)儿童,一组是有阅读障碍的低执行加工(低听力广度)儿童,以及一组在执行加工方面匹配(中等听力广度)的有和没有阅读障碍的儿童。在语音、视觉空间和语义WM任务上,对各亚组在初始(无探测或线索)、增益(使表现达到渐近水平的线索)和维持条件(无线索的渐近条件)下进行比较。结果表明:(a)执行加工能力高的无阅读障碍儿童的表现优于所有其他亚组;(b)执行加工能力低的阅读障碍亚组在所有任务和记忆条件下相对于所有其他亚组表现较差;(c)在执行加工方面匹配的有和没有阅读障碍的儿童在WM广度以及所有任务的WM变化方面具有可比性;(d)阅读障碍儿童的WM表现是高执行加工组的强线性函数,这表明任务的性质或特定成分构成不是WM表现的主要影响因素。综合来看,结果表明通用领域系统可能部分导致了阅读障碍儿童的WM较差,并且该系统可能独立于他们的阅读缺陷而运作。