Summerfeldt Laura J, Kloosterman Patricia H, Antony Martin M, Richter Margaret A, Swinson Richard P
Department of Psychology, Trent University, Peterborough, Ont K9J 7B8, Canada.
Behav Res Ther. 2004 Dec;42(12):1453-67. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2003.09.006.
The diverse symptomatology of obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) is being increasingly regarded as reducible to a few symptom dimensions. However, prevailing factor-analytically derived models of symptom structure omit a number of the well-recognized "miscellaneous" symptoms of OCD. This study sought to determine whether miscellaneous OCD symptoms, ascertained by the Yale-Brown Obsessive-Compulsive Scale symptom checklist, could be differentially and reliably predicted by four symptom factors (obsessions and checking, symmetry and ordering, contamination and cleaning, and hoarding) in two independent groups of individuals with OCD (n=381 and n=107). Logistic regression analyses were used to determine the association of each of the miscellaneous symptoms with the symptom factors; then a single confirmatory factor analysis was conducted to test the model of associations in the smaller sample. Sixteen (89%) of the 18 symptoms examined were reliably predicted by one (11 items) or two (5 items) of the factors, with obsessions and checking and symmetry and ordering emerging as foremost predictors. The expanded four-factor model showed good fit with data from the second sample. Results are conceptually meaningful, but suggest the inadequacy of groupings based solely upon overt behaviors. These findings may aid clinical understanding of OCD and be of value to studies using symptom factors to guide investigation of its causes and correlates.
强迫症(OCD)多样的症状表现越来越被认为可归结为几个症状维度。然而,目前基于因素分析得出的症状结构模型遗漏了一些公认的强迫症“其他”症状。本研究旨在确定由耶鲁-布朗强迫症量表症状清单确定的其他强迫症症状,是否能在两组独立的强迫症患者(n = 381和n = 107)中由四个症状因素(强迫观念与检查、对称与排序、污染与清洁、囤积)进行差异可靠预测。采用逻辑回归分析来确定每个其他症状与症状因素之间的关联;然后在较小样本中进行单一验证性因素分析以检验关联模型。所检查的18个症状中有16个(89%)可由一个因素(11项)或两个因素(5项)可靠预测,强迫观念与检查以及对称与排序成为首要预测因素。扩展的四因素模型与第二个样本的数据拟合良好。结果在概念上有意义,但表明仅基于明显行为的分组存在不足。这些发现可能有助于临床对强迫症的理解,并对使用症状因素指导其病因和相关因素研究具有价值。