Department of Clinical Psychology, Faculty of Educational Sciences and Psychology, Shiraz University, Shiraz, Iran.
BMC Psychol. 2024 Oct 15;12(1):552. doi: 10.1186/s40359-024-02058-0.
Attention to the heterogeneous manifestations of obsessive-compulsive symptoms observed in clinical and nonclinical populations has motivated researchers to use tools to identify homogeneous subgroups of obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) patients. The Obsessive-Compulsive Trait Core Dimensions Questionnaire (OC-TCDQ) is used to evaluate two motivational dimensions of OCD (harm avoidance (HA) and incompleteness (INC)), which has been developed in recent years based on the core dimensions model, and to classify homogeneous subgroups. This study aimed to validate the Farsi version of the OC-TCDQ in Iran.
The psychometric properties of the OC-TCDQ were tested in two clinical samples (209 patients with OCD) and nonclinical samples (209 participants without OCD). Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was conducted to test the two-factor structure. The measurement invariance between the clinical and nonclinical groups was evaluated. Reliability was tested using Cronbach's alpha, split-half, and retesting (two-week intervals). Convergent and divergent validity were analysed with Pearson's correlation and the incremental validity of this scale in predicting Yale-Brown Obsession Scale (Y-BOCS) and Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI) scores using hierarchical regression analysis. The discriminant validity of the two clinical and nonclinical groups was investigated with a t-test.
Similar to the original version, the CFA showed a good fit for the two-factor structure. The invariance of measurement between samples, good internal consistency and retest reliability, and convergent and divergent validity of this scale were confirmed. The results of hierarchical regression analysis indicated the increasing validity of this scale in predicting the Y-BOCS and BAI compared to the OBQ-44 (p < 0.05), and comparing the scores of two groups with and without OCD indicated its discriminant validity (p < 0.01).
These findings show that the Farsi-OC-TCDQ is a valid tool for evaluating the motivational dimensions of harm avoidance and incompleteness in Iranian individuals with and without OCD, and it allows us to compare the scores across groups.
对强迫症(OCD)患者的临床和非临床人群中观察到的异质强迫症症状的关注,促使研究人员使用工具来识别同质的 OCD 患者亚组。强迫症特质核心维度问卷(OC-TCDQ)用于评估 OCD 的两个动机维度(回避伤害(HA)和不完整性(INC)),该问卷是近年来基于核心维度模型开发的,用于对同质亚组进行分类。本研究旨在验证伊朗语版 OC-TCDQ。
OC-TCDQ 的心理测量学特性在两个临床样本(209 例 OCD 患者)和非临床样本(209 例无 OCD 参与者)中进行了测试。采用验证性因子分析(CFA)检验两因素结构。评估临床组和非临床组之间的测量不变性。采用 Cronbach's alpha、半分、重测(两周间隔)检验信度。采用 Pearson 相关分析和分层回归分析评估聚合和发散效度,该量表对耶鲁-布朗强迫症量表(Y-BOCS)和贝克焦虑量表(BAI)评分的预测的增量效度。采用 t 检验研究两组临床和非临床组的判别效度。
与原始版本类似,CFA 对两因素结构的拟合度良好。验证了样本间测量的不变性、良好的内部一致性和重测信度,以及该量表的聚合和发散效度。分层回归分析结果表明,与 OBQ-44 相比,该量表在预测 Y-BOCS 和 BAI 方面的有效性有所提高(p<0.05),且比较 OCD 组和非 OCD 组的分数表明其具有判别效度(p<0.01)。
这些发现表明,伊朗语版 OC-TCDQ 是一种评估伊朗 OCD 患者和非 OCD 个体回避伤害和不完整性动机维度的有效工具,并且可以比较不同组的分数。