Foynes Melissa M, Riley Anthony L
Psychopharmacology Laboratory, Department of Psychology, American University, 4400 Massachusetts Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20016, USA.
Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 2004 Oct;79(2):303-8. doi: 10.1016/j.pbb.2004.08.002.
Conditioned taste aversions (CTAs) are differentially induced by cocaine and morphine in the Lewis and Fisher 344 (LEW and F344, respectively) rat strains. Although the acquisition of LiCl-induced aversions has recently been reported to be comparable between the two strains, these aversions were induced by the oral consumption of LiCl, and the possibility exists that, given their different weights, that differential doses were functionally administered. To address the issue of LiCl-induced aversions in LEW and F344 rats (and to control for this possible confound), the present study assessed the ability of intraperitoneally (ip) administered LiCl to induce aversions in the two strains. Specifically, rats from both strains were given 20-min access to saccharin and injected immediately, thereafter, with 0.3, 0.6, 0.9 or 1.2 mEq/kg, 0.15 M LiCl (or its distilled water vehicle). Under these conditions, both strains acquired dose-dependent aversions that increased over repeated trials. Although there was no overall strain difference in LiCl-induced aversions, LEW rats displayed a stronger aversion at the 0.3 mEq/kg dose (on Trial 3) and acquired the aversion at this dose more rapidly than the F344 rats did (by Trial 2 vs. Trial 3). Although evident, this strain difference with LiCl does not parallel that reported with morphine (in which F344 rats are more sensitive than LEW rats) or with cocaine (in which the differences between LEW and F344 rats are larger and occur at more doses and on more trials). These cross-drug comparisons suggest that strain differences in aversion learning are drug dependent. Because drug acceptability has been reported to be a function of the balance between the reinforcing and aversive effects of various compounds, the examination of possible strain differences in aversion learning with a range of such compounds may provide insight into drug acceptability (and use) in these strains.
在Lewis和Fisher 344(分别为LEW和F344)大鼠品系中,可卡因和吗啡分别能差异性地诱导条件性味觉厌恶(CTA)。尽管最近有报道称,LiCl诱导的厌恶在这两个品系之间的获得情况相当,但这些厌恶是通过口服LiCl诱导产生的,并且鉴于它们体重不同,存在功能性给予不同剂量LiCl的可能性。为了解决LEW和F344大鼠中LiCl诱导的厌恶问题(并控制这种可能的混淆因素),本研究评估了腹腔注射LiCl在这两个品系中诱导厌恶的能力。具体而言,给两个品系的大鼠提供20分钟时间接触糖精,之后立即注射0.3、0.6、0.9或1.2 mEq/kg的0.15 M LiCl(或其蒸馏水载体)。在这些条件下,两个品系都获得了剂量依赖性的厌恶,且在重复试验中有所增加。尽管在LiCl诱导的厌恶方面没有总体品系差异,但LEW大鼠在0.3 mEq/kg剂量时(在试验3中)表现出更强的厌恶,并且比F344大鼠更快地在该剂量下获得厌恶(分别在试验2和试验3时)。尽管这种LiCl诱导的品系差异很明显,但它与吗啡(F344大鼠比LEW大鼠更敏感)或可卡因(LEW和F344大鼠之间的差异更大,且在更多剂量和更多试验中出现)所报道的品系差异并不平行。这些跨药物比较表明,厌恶学习中的品系差异是药物依赖性的。由于据报道药物可接受性是各种化合物强化和厌恶作用之间平衡的函数,因此用一系列此类化合物研究厌恶学习中可能存在的品系差异,可能会为这些品系中的药物可接受性(和使用情况)提供见解。