Suppr超能文献

为呼吸暂停患者开发一种使用改良型口对袋复苏器改善无保护气道通气的策略。

Developing a strategy to improve ventilation in an unprotected airway with a modified mouth-to-bag resuscitator in apneic patients.

作者信息

von Goedecke Achim, Keller Christian, Wagner-Berger Horst G, Voelckel Wolfgang G, Hörmann Christoph, Zecha-Stallinger Angelika, Wenzel Volker

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Medical University, Innsbruck, Austria.

出版信息

Anesth Analg. 2004 Nov;99(5):1516-1520. doi: 10.1213/01.ANE.0000133581.31782.EC.

Abstract

The strategies to ensure safety during ventilation of an unprotected airway are limiting airway pressure and/or inspiratory flow. In this prospective, randomized study we assessed the effect of face mask ventilation with small tidal volumes in the modified mouth-to-bag resuscitator (maximal volume, 500 mL) versus a pediatric self-inflatable bag versus automatic pressure-controlled ventilation in 40 adult apneic patients during induction of anesthesia. The mouth-to-bag resuscitator requires the rescuer to blow up a balloon inside the self-inflating bag that subsequently displaces air which then flows into the patient's airway. Respiratory variables were measured with a pulmonary monitor (CP-100). Mouth-to-bag resuscitator and pressure-controlled ventilation resulted in significantly lower (mean +/- sd) peak airway pressure (8 +/- 2 and 8 +/- 1 cm H(2)O), peak inspiratory flow rate (0.7 +/- 0.1 and 0.7 +/- 0.1 L/s), and larger inspiratory time fraction (33% +/- 5% and 47% +/- 2%) in comparison to pediatric self-inflating bag ventilation (12 +/- 3 cm H(2)O; 1 +/- 0.2 L/s; 27% +/- 4%; all P < 0.001). The tidal volumes were similar between groups. No stomach inflation occurred in either group. We conclude that using a modified mouth-to-bag resuscitator or automatic pressure-controlled ventilation with similar small tidal volumes during face mask ventilation resulted in an approximately 25% reduction in peak airway pressure when compared with a standard pediatric self-inflating bag.

摘要

在未受保护气道通气期间确保安全的策略是限制气道压力和/或吸气流量。在这项前瞻性随机研究中,我们评估了在40例成年麻醉诱导期呼吸暂停患者中,使用改良口鼻面罩复苏器(最大容量500 mL)进行小潮气量面罩通气与小儿自动充气式复苏袋通气以及自动压力控制通气的效果。口鼻面罩复苏器需要施救者向自动充气式复苏袋内的一个气囊吹气,随后该气囊排出空气,空气再流入患者气道。使用肺功能监测仪(CP - 100)测量呼吸变量。与小儿自动充气式复苏袋通气相比(气道峰压12±3 cmH₂O;吸气峰流速1±0.2 L/s;吸气时间分数27%±4%),口鼻面罩复苏器和压力控制通气导致气道峰压(8±2和8±1 cmH₂O)、吸气峰流速(0.7±0.1和0.7±0.1 L/s)显著降低,吸气时间分数增大(33%±5%和47%±2%)(所有P<0.001)。各组间潮气量相似。两组均未出现胃胀气。我们得出结论,在面罩通气期间,使用改良口鼻面罩复苏器或自动压力控制通气并采用相似的小潮气量,与标准小儿自动充气式复苏袋相比,气道峰压可降低约25%。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验