Hien T T, Davis T M E, Chuong L V, Ilett K F, Sinh D X T, Phu N H, Agus C, Chiswell G M, White N J, Farrar J
Oxford University Clinical Research Unit, Hospital for Tropical Diseases, 190 Ben Ham Tu, Quan 5, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2004 Nov;48(11):4234-9. doi: 10.1128/AAC.48.11.4234-4239.2004.
The first-dose pharmacokinetic properties of intramuscular (i.m.) artesunate (ARTS; 2.4 mg/kg immediately [stat], followed by 1.2 mg/kg i.m. daily) and artemether (ARM; 3.2 mg/kg i.m. stat, followed by 1.6 mg/kg i.m. daily) were compared in Vietnamese adults with severe falciparum malaria. A total of 19 patients were studied; 9 received ARTS, and 10 received ARM. ARTS was absorbed very rapidly; concentrations in plasma peaked between 1,362 and 8,388 nmol/liter (median, 5,710 nmol/liter) within 20 min of injection and then declined with a median (range) half-life (t(1/2)) of 30 (3 to 67) min. ARTS was hydrolyzed rapidly and completely to the biologically active metabolite dihydroartemisinin (DHA). Peak DHA concentrations in plasma ranged between 1,718 and 7,080 nmol/liter (median, 3,060 nmol/liter) and declined with a t(1/2) of 52 (26 to 69) min. In contrast, ARM was slowly and erratically absorbed. The absorption profile appeared biphasic. Maximum ARM concentrations in plasma ranged between 67 nmol/liter (a value close to the 50% inhibitory concentration for some Plasmodium falciparum isolates) and 1,631 nmol/liter (median, 574 nmol/liter) and occurred at a median (range) of 10 (1.5 to 24) h. There was relatively little conversion to DHA. After i.m. injection in cases of severe malaria, absorption of the water-soluble ARTS is rapid and extensive, whereas the oil-based ARM is slowly and erratically absorbed, with relatively little conversion to the more active DHA. On the basis of this pharmacological study, parenteral ARTS is preferable to ARM as an initial antimalarial therapy, particularly in the most seriously ill patients. These findings should be formally assessed by a randomized clinical trial.
在患有严重恶性疟原虫疟疾的越南成年人中,比较了肌肉注射(i.m.)青蒿琥酯(ARTS;立即静脉注射2.4mg/kg,随后每日静脉注射1.2mg/kg)和蒿甲醚(ARM;静脉注射3.2mg/kg,随后每日静脉注射1.6mg/kg)的首剂药代动力学特性。共研究了19例患者;9例接受ARTS,10例接受ARM。ARTS吸收非常迅速;注射后20分钟内血浆浓度在1362至8388nmol/升之间达到峰值(中位数为5710nmol/升),然后下降,中位数(范围)半衰期(t(1/2))为30(3至67)分钟。ARTS迅速且完全水解为具有生物活性的代谢产物双氢青蒿素(DHA)。血浆中DHA的峰值浓度在1718至7080nmol/升之间(中位数为3060nmol/升),并以52(26至69)分钟的t(1/2)下降。相比之下,ARM吸收缓慢且不稳定。吸收曲线呈双相性。血浆中ARM的最大浓度在67nmol/升(接近某些恶性疟原虫分离株的50%抑制浓度的值)至1631nmol/升之间(中位数为574nmol/升),在中位数(范围)为10(1.5至24)小时时出现。转化为DHA的量相对较少。在严重疟疾病例中进行肌肉注射后,水溶性ARTS的吸收迅速且广泛,而油基ARM的吸收缓慢且不稳定,转化为活性更高的DHA的量相对较少。基于这项药理学研究,肠外ARTS作为初始抗疟治疗优于ARM,特别是在病情最严重的患者中。这些发现应通过随机临床试验进行正式评估。