Sämann A, Kaiser J, Hunger-Dathe W, Schiel R, Müller U A
Department of Internal Medicine III, Friedrich-Schiller-University of Jena, Jena, Germany.
Exp Clin Endocrinol Diabetes. 2004 Oct;112(9):531-7. doi: 10.1055/s-2004-821311.
INTRODUCTION/HYPOTHESIS: There remains insufficient knowledge about the quality of diabetes therapy regarding structure, process and outcome given by primary care in Thuringia, and elsewhere in Germany. The project assesses a means of determining the quality of diabetes therapy in primary care by analysis of HbA1c values within a broad territory.
HbA1c tests of Thuringian patients were analysed by 20 participating medical laboratories between January 1 and March 31, 2002; each HbA1c test was identified by the postal code of the Thuringian General Practitioner (GP) who ordered the test and adjusted by a standardisation procedure (mean normal of healthy subjects 5 %). The German state of Thuringia (population of 2,421,871) consists of 23 urban and rural districts. This format was also used in the present study.
Twenty participating laboratories contributed 59,702 HbA1c tests from diabetic patients in Thuringia. Adjusted mean HbA1c of entire Thuringia: 6.75 %, 36.4 % of all HbA1c tests were above 7.0 % and 3,0 % of all HbA1c values above 10.0 %. Regional percentage of HbA1c tests above 7.0 % ranged between 28.2 % and 47.3 %. Regional percentage of HbA1c tests above 10.0 % ranged between 1.8 % and 4.8 %. Subgroup analyses comparing urban vs. rural districts showed significantly lower mean HbA1c (6.72 % vs. 6.75 %, CI 0.01 - 0.06, p < 0.01) and percentage of HbA1c tests above 7 % (8.19 % vs. 8.24 %, CI 0.01 - 0.08, p < 0.01) in urban areas.
Mean HbA1c as an indicator of glycaemic control of diabetes patients in primary care in Thuringia was good. The percentage of patients who need immediate medical intervention to prevent acute complications varied between districts, which is indicative for differences in quality of diabetes care in Thuringia. However, the proposed method is still experimental and has not yet been evaluated. Consequently, considerable bias might influence the results.
引言/假设:图林根州及德国其他地区的初级医疗保健机构在糖尿病治疗的结构、过程和结果方面,仍缺乏足够的了解。该项目旨在通过分析广泛区域内的糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)值,评估一种确定初级医疗保健中糖尿病治疗质量的方法。
20家参与研究的医学实验室对2002年1月1日至3月31日期间图林根州患者的HbA1c检测结果进行了分析;每次HbA1c检测均通过开具检测单的图林根州全科医生的邮政编码进行识别,并通过标准化程序进行调整(健康受试者的平均正常水平为5%)。德国图林根州(人口2421871)由23个城乡区域组成。本研究也采用了这种划分方式。
20家参与研究的实验室提供了图林根州糖尿病患者的59702次HbA1c检测结果。图林根州整体调整后的平均HbA1c水平为6.75%,所有HbA1c检测结果中36.4%高于7.0%,所有HbA1c值中3.0%高于10.0%。HbA1c检测结果高于7.0%的区域百分比在28.2%至47.3%之间。HbA1c检测结果高于10.0%的区域百分比在1.8%至4.8%之间。城乡区域亚组分析显示,城市地区的平均HbA1c水平(6.72%对6.75%,CI 0.01 - 0.06,p < 0.01)和HbA1c检测结果高于7%的百分比(8.19%对8.24%,CI 0.01 - 0.08,p < 0.01)显著更低。
图林根州初级医疗保健中,作为糖尿病患者血糖控制指标的平均HbA1c水平良好。需要立即进行医疗干预以预防急性并发症的患者百分比在不同区域有所差异,这表明图林根州糖尿病护理质量存在差异。然而,所提出的方法仍处于实验阶段,尚未经过评估。因此,可能存在相当大的偏差影响结果。