Noveck Ira A, Goel Vinod, Smith Kathleen W
Institut des Sciences Cognitives Lyon, France.
Cortex. 2004 Sep-Dec;40(4-5):613-22. doi: 10.1016/s0010-9452(08)70157-6.
Behavioral predictions about reasoning have usually contrasted two accounts, Mental Logic and Mental Models. Neuroimaging techniques have been providing new measures that transcend this debate. We tested a hypothesis from Goel and Dolan (2003) that predicts neural activity predominantly in a left parietal-frontal system when participants reason with arbitrary (non-meaningful) materials. In an event-related fMRI investigation, we employed propositional syllogisms, the majority of which involved conditional reasoning. While investigating conditional reasoning generally, we ultimately focused on the neural activity linked to the two valid conditional forms--Modus Ponens (If p then q; p//q) and Modus Tollens (If p then q; not-q//not-p). Consistent with Goel and Dolan (2003), we found a left lateralized parietal frontal network for both inference forms with increasing activation when reasoning becomes more challenging by way of Modus Tollens. These findings show that the previous findings with more complex Aristotlean syllogisms are robust and cast doubt upon accounts of reasoning that accord primary inferential processes uniquely to either the right hemisphere or to language areas.
关于推理的行为预测通常对比了两种观点,即心理逻辑和心理模型。神经成像技术一直在提供超越这场争论的新方法。我们检验了来自戈尔和多兰(2003年)的一个假设,该假设预测当参与者用任意(无意义)材料进行推理时,神经活动主要发生在左顶叶-额叶系统。在一项事件相关功能磁共振成像研究中,我们采用了命题三段论,其中大部分涉及条件推理。在总体研究条件推理时,我们最终聚焦于与两种有效的条件形式相关的神经活动——肯定前件式(如果p那么q;p//q)和否定后件式(如果p那么q;非q//非p)。与戈尔和多兰(2003年)一致,我们发现两种推理形式都存在左侧化的顶叶-额叶网络,随着通过否定后件式推理变得更具挑战性,激活增加。这些发现表明,先前关于更复杂的亚里士多德三段论的发现是可靠的,并且对那些将主要推理过程唯一地归于右半球或语言区域的推理观点提出了质疑。