• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

演绎和数学处理的不同神经基质。

Distinct neural substrates for deductive and mathematical processing.

作者信息

Kroger James K, Nystrom Leigh E, Cohen Jonathan D, Johnson-Laird Philip N

机构信息

Department of Psychology, New Mexico State University, 220 Science Hall, Las Cruces, NM 88003, USA.

出版信息

Brain Res. 2008 Dec 3;1243:86-103. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2008.07.128. Epub 2008 Aug 15.

DOI:10.1016/j.brainres.2008.07.128
PMID:18760263
Abstract

In an effort to clarify how deductive reasoning is accomplished, an fMRI study was performed to observe the neural substrates of logical reasoning and mathematical calculation. Participants viewed a problem statement and three premises, and then either a conclusion or a mathematical formula. They had to indicate whether the conclusion followed from the premises, or to solve the mathematical formula. Language areas of the brain (Broca's and Wernicke's area) responded as the premises and the conclusion were read, but solution of the problems was then carried out by non-language areas. Regions in right prefrontal cortex and inferior parietal lobe were more active for reasoning than for calculation, whereas regions in left prefrontal cortex and superior parietal lobe were more active for calculation than for reasoning. In reasoning, only those problems calling for a search for counterexamples to conclusions recruited right frontal pole. These results have important implications for understanding how higher cognition, including deduction, is implemented in the brain. Different sorts of thinking recruit separate neural substrates, and logical reasoning goes beyond linguistic regions of the brain.

摘要

为了阐明演绎推理是如何完成的,进行了一项功能磁共振成像(fMRI)研究,以观察逻辑推理和数学计算的神经基础。参与者会看到一个问题陈述和三个前提,然后要么是一个结论,要么是一个数学公式。他们必须指出结论是否能从前提中得出,或者解出数学公式。当阅读前提和结论时,大脑的语言区域(布洛卡区和韦尼克区)会做出反应,但问题的解决随后由非语言区域执行。右前额叶皮层和顶下叶的区域在推理时比在计算时更活跃,而左前额叶皮层和顶上叶的区域在计算时比在推理时更活跃。在推理过程中,只有那些需要寻找结论反例的问题才会激活右额极。这些结果对于理解包括演绎在内的高级认知在大脑中是如何实现的具有重要意义。不同类型的思维会调用不同的神经基础,并且逻辑推理超出了大脑的语言区域。

相似文献

1
Distinct neural substrates for deductive and mathematical processing.演绎和数学处理的不同神经基质。
Brain Res. 2008 Dec 3;1243:86-103. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2008.07.128. Epub 2008 Aug 15.
2
Neural correlates of spontaneous percept switches in ambiguous stimuli: an event-related functional magnetic resonance imaging study.模棱两可刺激中自发感知转换的神经关联:一项事件相关功能磁共振成像研究。
Eur J Neurosci. 2008 Dec;28(11):2325-32. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2008.06520.x.
3
All for one but not one for all: how multiple number representations are recruited in one numerical task.人人为我,而非我为人人:在一项数字任务中如何调用多种数字表征。
Brain Res. 2008 Jan 2;1187:154-66. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2007.09.094. Epub 2007 Oct 12.
4
Neural dynamics of the intention to speak.意图说话的神经动力学。
Cereb Cortex. 2010 Aug;20(8):1891-7. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhp255. Epub 2009 Dec 14.
5
How is cognitive control of a simple mental image achieved? An fMRI study.如何实现对简单心理意象的认知控制?一项功能磁共振成像研究。
Int J Neurosci. 2008 Dec;118(12):1781-96. doi: 10.1080/00207450802328482.
6
Word rhyming as a probe of hemispheric language dominance with functional magnetic resonance imaging.将押韵词作为功能性磁共振成像探测半球语言优势的手段。
Neuropsychiatry Neuropsychol Behav Neurol. 2000 Oct;13(4):264-70.
7
Mental representations of action: the neural correlates of the verbal and motor components.动作的心理表象:言语和运动成分的神经关联。
Brain Res. 2010 Apr 30;1328:89-103. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2010.02.082. Epub 2010 Mar 11.
8
The anatomy of language revisited.再探语言的剖析
Biol Res. 1997;30(4):171-83.
9
Dominance of the left oblique view in activating the cortical network for face recognition.左斜视图在激活用于人脸识别的皮质网络中的主导作用。
Neurosci Res. 2004 Dec;50(4):475-80. doi: 10.1016/j.neures.2004.08.014.
10
Functional neuroimaging of belief, disbelief, and uncertainty.信念、怀疑与不确定性的功能性神经成像
Ann Neurol. 2008 Feb;63(2):141-7. doi: 10.1002/ana.21301.

引用本文的文献

1
Dissociating Language and Thought in Human Reasoning.在人类推理中分离语言与思维
Brain Sci. 2022 Dec 29;13(1):67. doi: 10.3390/brainsci13010067.
2
The underlying neural bases of the reversal error while solving algebraic word problems.解决代数文字题时产生反转错误的潜在神经基础。
Sci Rep. 2022 Dec 15;12(1):21654. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-25442-5.
3
Paradoxical Reasoning: An fMRI Study.矛盾推理:一项功能磁共振成像研究。
Front Psychol. 2022 May 2;13:850491. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.850491. eCollection 2022.
4
Integrating Philosophy of Understanding With the Cognitive Sciences.将理解哲学与认知科学相结合。
Front Syst Neurosci. 2022 Mar 10;16:764708. doi: 10.3389/fnsys.2022.764708. eCollection 2022.
5
Frontopolar Cortex Specializes for Manipulation of Structured Information.额极皮质专门用于处理结构化信息。
Front Syst Neurosci. 2022 Mar 2;16:788395. doi: 10.3389/fnsys.2022.788395. eCollection 2022.
6
Deductive-reasoning brain networks: A coordinate-based meta-analysis of the neural signatures in deductive reasoning.演绎推理脑网络:演绎推理神经特征的基于坐标的荟萃分析。
Brain Behav. 2020 Dec;10(12):e01853. doi: 10.1002/brb3.1853. Epub 2020 Sep 29.
7
Re-imaging the intentional stance.重新想象意向立场。
Proc Biol Sci. 2020 Apr 29;287(1925):20200244. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2020.0244. Epub 2020 Apr 15.
8
Human inference beyond syllogisms: an approach using external graphical representations.超越三段论的人类推理:一种使用外部图形表示的方法。
Cogn Process. 2019 Feb;20(1):103-115. doi: 10.1007/s10339-018-0877-2. Epub 2018 Aug 3.
9
Meta-analytic evidence for a core problem solving network across multiple representational domains.跨多个表示域的核心问题解决网络的荟萃分析证据。
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2018 Sep;92:318-337. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2018.06.009. Epub 2018 Jun 23.
10
The role of the insula in intuitive expert bug detection in computer code: an fMRI study.脑岛在计算机代码直觉型专家错误检测中的作用:一项 fMRI 研究。
Brain Imaging Behav. 2019 Jun;13(3):623-637. doi: 10.1007/s11682-018-9885-1.