• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

阅读障碍的早期干预:在联结主义框架下教授字母原则

Early intervention for reading disabilities: teaching the alphabet principle in a connectionist framework.

作者信息

Berninger V W, Abbott R D, Zook D, Ogier S, Lemos-Britton Z, Brooksher R

机构信息

Department of Educational Psychology, University of Washington, Seattle 98195-3600, USA.

出版信息

J Learn Disabil. 1999 Nov-Dec;32(6):491-503. doi: 10.1177/002221949903200604.

DOI:10.1177/002221949903200604
PMID:15510439
Abstract

Forty-eight children referred by teachers at the end of first grade for difficulty in reading were randomly assigned to three treatments, all of which modeled connections between written and spoken words but did not teach phonics rules, for eight half-hour individual tutoring sessions. The children were taught 48 words of varying orders of spelling-sound predictability (Venezky, 1995) using a whole-word method, for making connections between a word's name and its constituent letters; a subword method, for making connections between each color-coded spelling unit and its corresponding phonemes; or a combined whole-word and subword method. Regardless of the method used, children improved reliably on standardized reading measures and the taught words, showing that they could make connections between written and spoken words at the whole word and subword levels, even when rules were not taught. By posttest, the subword method showed a reliable advantage on a standardized test of real word reading. Knowledge of sounds associated with both multiletter and single-letter spelling units predicted reading achievement. Order of spelling-sound predictability (easy, moderate, difficult) was correlated with standardized measures of reading at pretest and posttest, and the magnitude of the relationship increased as a result of the intervention. Individual differences in verbal intelligence, rapid automatized naming, and phonological and orthographic skills predicted response to the intervention. Instructional implications of the results are discussed.

摘要

在一年级末因阅读困难被教师转介的48名儿童被随机分配到三种治疗方法中,所有方法都模拟书面和口头单词之间的联系,但不教授拼读规则,进行八次半小时的个别辅导课程。使用全词法教授48个拼写-发音可预测性顺序不同的单词(Venezky,1995),以建立单词名称与其组成字母之间的联系;使用子词法,以建立每个颜色编码的拼写单元与其相应音素之间的联系;或使用全词法和子词法相结合的方法。无论使用哪种方法,儿童在标准化阅读测试和所学单词方面都有可靠的进步,表明即使不教授规则,他们也能在全词和子词层面建立书面和口头单词之间的联系。到后测时,子词法在真实单词阅读的标准化测试中显示出可靠的优势。与多字母和单字母拼写单元相关的发音知识可预测阅读成绩。拼写-发音可预测性顺序(容易、中等、困难)与前测和后测的标准化阅读测试相关,并且由于干预,这种关系的程度有所增加。言语智力、快速自动命名以及语音和正字法技能的个体差异可预测对干预的反应。讨论了结果的教学意义。

相似文献

1
Early intervention for reading disabilities: teaching the alphabet principle in a connectionist framework.阅读障碍的早期干预:在联结主义框架下教授字母原则
J Learn Disabil. 1999 Nov-Dec;32(6):491-503. doi: 10.1177/002221949903200604.
2
A connectionist approach to making the predictability of English orthography explicit to at-risk beginning readers: evidence for alternative, effective strategies.一种让有风险的初学读者明确英语拼写可预测性的联结主义方法:替代有效策略的证据。
Dev Neuropsychol. 2000;17(2):241-71. doi: 10.1207/S15326942DN1702_06.
3
Predicting Individual Differences in Reading and Spelling Skill With Artificial Script-Based Letter-Speech Sound Training.基于人工脚本的字母-语音训练预测阅读和拼写技能的个体差异。
J Learn Disabil. 2018 Nov/Dec;51(6):552-564. doi: 10.1177/0022219417715407. Epub 2017 Jun 16.
4
Predicting response to early reading intervention from verbal IQ, reading-related language abilities, attention ratings, and verbal IQ-word reading discrepancy: failure to validate discrepancy method.从言语智商、阅读相关语言能力、注意力评分以及言语智商与单词阅读差异预测早期阅读干预的反应:差异方法验证失败。
J Learn Disabil. 2003 Jan-Feb;36(1):24-33. doi: 10.1177/00222194030360010401.
5
Predicting responsiveness to a sustained reading and spelling intervention in children with dyslexia.预测诵读困难儿童对持续阅读和拼写干预的反应能力。
Dyslexia. 2019 May;25(2):190-206. doi: 10.1002/dys.1614. Epub 2019 Apr 23.
6
A comparison of two reading interventions for children with reading disabilities.针对阅读障碍儿童的两种阅读干预方法的比较。
J Learn Disabil. 2000 May-Jun;33(3):257-77. doi: 10.1177/002221940003300304.
7
Beginning reading intervention as inoculation or insulin: first-grade reading performance of strong responders to kindergarten intervention.将阅读干预作为预防接种或胰岛素:对幼儿园干预有强烈反应者的一年级阅读表现
J Learn Disabil. 2004 Mar-Apr;37(2):90-104. doi: 10.1177/00222194040370020101.
8
The effects of a multilinguistic morphological awareness approach for improving language and literacy.多语言形态意识方法对提高语言和读写能力的影响。
J Learn Disabil. 2014 Jan-Feb;47(1):76-85. doi: 10.1177/0022219413509972.
9
Orthographic processing efficiency in developmental dyslexia: an investigation of age and treatment factors at the sublexical level.发展性阅读障碍者的正字法加工效率:亚词汇水平上的年龄和治疗因素的研究。
Ann Dyslexia. 2011 Jun;61(1):111-35. doi: 10.1007/s11881-010-0050-9. Epub 2011 Jan 7.
10
Computer-assisted remedial reading intervention for school beginners at risk for reading disability.计算机辅助补救性阅读干预对有阅读障碍风险的学校初学者的帮助。
Child Dev. 2011 May-Jun;82(3):1013-28. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2011.01580.x. Epub 2011 Mar 18.

引用本文的文献

1
Predicting Response to Neuropsychological Intervention in Developmental Dyslexia: A Retrospective Study.预测发育性阅读障碍对神经心理干预的反应:一项回顾性研究。
Brain Sci. 2024 Jul 31;14(8):775. doi: 10.3390/brainsci14080775.
2
Are Child Cognitive Characteristics Strong Predictors of Responses to Intervention? A Meta-Analysis.儿童认知特征是干预反应的强预测指标吗?一项荟萃分析。
Rev Educ Res. 2015 Sep 1;85(3):395-429. doi: 10.3102/0034654314555996. Epub 2014 Nov 12.
3
IQ Is Not Strongly Related to Response to Reading Instruction: A Meta-Analytic Interpretation.
智商与阅读教学反应的关联性不强:一项元分析解读
Except Child. 2009 Oct 1;76(1):31-51. doi: 10.1177/001440290907600102.