Suppr超能文献

儿童认知特征是干预反应的强预测指标吗?一项荟萃分析。

Are Child Cognitive Characteristics Strong Predictors of Responses to Intervention? A Meta-Analysis.

作者信息

Stuebing Karla K, Barth Amy E, Trahan Lisa H, Reddy Radhika R, Miciak Jeremy, Fletcher Jack M

机构信息

Texas Institute for Measurement, Evaluation, and Statistics, Department of Psychology, University of Houston, 4811 Calhoun Rd, 4th Floor, Houston, TX 77204.

Department of Special Education at the University of Missouri-Columbia, 311B Townsent Hall, Columbia, MO 65211.

出版信息

Rev Educ Res. 2015 Sep 1;85(3):395-429. doi: 10.3102/0034654314555996. Epub 2014 Nov 12.

Abstract

We conducted a meta-analysis of 28 studies comprising 39 samples to ask the question, "What is the magnitude of the association between various baseline child cognitive characteristics and response to reading intervention?" Studies were located via literature searches, contact with researchers in the field, and review of references from the National Reading Panel Report. Eligible participant populations included at-risk elementary school children enrolled in the third grade or below. Effects were analyzed using a shifting unit of analysis approach within three statistical models: cognitive characteristics predicting growth curve slope (Model 1, mean r r = .21), or postintervention reading controlling for preintervention reading (Model 3, mean r = .15). Effects were homogeneous within each model when effects were aggregated within study. The small size of the effects calls into question the practical significance and utility of using cognitive characteristics for prediction of response when baseline reading is available.

摘要

我们对28项研究(包含39个样本)进行了荟萃分析,以探讨“各种基线儿童认知特征与阅读干预反应之间的关联程度如何?”通过文献检索、与该领域研究人员联系以及查阅国家阅读小组报告的参考文献来查找研究。符合条件的参与人群包括就读于三年级或以下的高危小学儿童。在三个统计模型中使用分析单位转移法分析效应:认知特征预测生长曲线斜率(模型1,平均r = 0.21),或在控制干预前阅读情况的前提下分析干预后阅读情况(模型3,平均r = 0.15)。当效应在研究内汇总时,每个模型内的效应是同质的。当有基线阅读数据时,效应规模较小,这使得利用认知特征预测反应的实际意义和效用受到质疑。

相似文献

2
3
5
7

引用本文的文献

4
Revisiting the definition of dyslexia.重新审视诵读困难症的定义。
Ann Dyslexia. 2024 Oct;74(3):282-302. doi: 10.1007/s11881-023-00295-3. Epub 2024 Jan 9.

本文引用的文献

1
Learning Styles: Concepts and Evidence.学习风格:概念与证据。
Psychol Sci Public Interest. 2008 Dec;9(3):105-19. doi: 10.1111/j.1539-6053.2009.01038.x. Epub 2008 Dec 1.
4
Response to Intervention: Preventing and Remediating Academic Difficulties.干预反应:预防与纠正学业困难
Child Dev Perspect. 2009 Apr;3(1):30-37. doi: 10.1111/j.1750-8606.2008.00072.x.
7
Predictors of response to intervention of word reading fluency in Dutch.荷兰语单词阅读流畅性干预反应的预测因素。
J Learn Disabil. 2010 May-Jun;43(3):212-28. doi: 10.1177/0022219409345015. Epub 2009 Dec 23.
9
Revisiting the simple view of reading.重新审视阅读的简单观点。
Br J Educ Psychol. 2009 Jun;79(Pt 2):353-70. doi: 10.1348/978185408X369020. Epub 2008 Dec 16.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验