Murphy Gavin J, Bryan Alan J, Angelini Gianni D
Bristol Heart Institute, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom.
Ann Thorac Surg. 2004 Nov;78(5):1861-7. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2004.07.024.
Left internal mammary artery to left anterior descending coronary artery bypass grafting integrated with percutaneous coronary angioplasty (hybrid procedure) offers multivessel revascularization with minimal morbidity in high-risk patients. This is caused in part by the avoidance of cardiopulmonary bypass-related morbidity and manipulation of the aorta coupled with minimally invasive techniques. Hybrid revascularization is currently reserved for particularly high-risk patients or those with favorable anatomic variants however, largely because of the emergence of off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting, which permits more complete multivessel revascularization, with low morbidity in high-risk groups. The wider introduction of hybrid revascularization is limited chiefly by the high number of repeat interventions compared with off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting, which occurs because of the target vessel failure rate of percutaneous coronary intervention. Other demerits are the costs and logistic problems associated with performing two procedures with differing periprocedural management protocols. Recently, drug-eluting stents have reduced the need for repeat intervention after percutaneous coronary intervention, and this has raised the possibility that the results of hybrid revascularization may now equal or even better those of off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting. Although undoubtedly effective at reducing in-stent restenosis, drug-eluting stents will not address the issues of incomplete revascularization or the logistic problems associated with hybrid. Uncertainty regarding the long-term effectiveness of drug-eluting stents in many patients, as well as their high cost when compared with those of off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting surgery, also militates against the wider introduction of hybrid revascularization.
左乳内动脉至左前降支冠状动脉搭桥术与经皮冠状动脉血管成形术相结合(杂交手术),可为高危患者提供多支血管血运重建,且发病率最低。部分原因是避免了体外循环相关的发病率和主动脉操作,并结合了微创技术。然而,目前杂交血运重建主要用于特别高危的患者或具有有利解剖变异的患者,这主要是因为非体外循环冠状动脉搭桥术的出现,它能实现更完整的多支血管血运重建,在高危组中发病率较低。与非体外循环冠状动脉搭桥术相比,杂交血运重建的广泛应用主要受到重复干预次数较多的限制,这是由于经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的靶血管失败率所致。其他缺点包括与执行两种具有不同围手术期管理方案的手术相关的成本和后勤问题。最近,药物洗脱支架减少了经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后重复干预的需求,这增加了杂交血运重建结果现在可能等于甚至优于非体外循环冠状动脉搭桥术的可能性。尽管药物洗脱支架无疑在减少支架内再狭窄方面有效,但它无法解决不完全血运重建问题或与杂交相关的后勤问题。许多患者对药物洗脱支架长期有效性的不确定性,以及与非体外循环冠状动脉搭桥术相比其高昂的成本,也不利于杂交血运重建的更广泛应用。