Awonuga A O, Dwarakanath L S, Johanson R, Hyde C, Taylor R, Khan K S
Academic Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Birmingham, UK.
J Obstet Gynaecol. 2000 Jan;20(1):10-4. doi: 10.1080/01443610063372.
We evaluated the effect of literature appraisal workshops on participants views, attitudes and knowledge about evidence-based medicine in the West Midlands region in 1998. The performance of 55 practitioners was evaluated, before and after attending the workshop. After attending the workshop, participants paid more attention to the study design (81% vs. 98%, P=0.02), they did not find research evidence confusing (35% vs. 52%, P=0.05), and they felt more confident in assessing research evidence (26% vs. 59%, P=0.0001). Their mean knowledge scores improved from 47.3 (SD12.2) to 57.9 (SD 9.0) ( P=0.0001). Our critical appraisal skills workshops improved attitudes and knowledge needed for the provision of evidence-supported healthcare. Such workshops should be incorporated in postgraduate obstetrics and gynaecology training programmes.
1998年,我们评估了文献评估研讨会对西米德兰兹地区参与者关于循证医学的观点、态度和知识的影响。在参加研讨会前后,对55名从业者的表现进行了评估。参加研讨会后,参与者更加关注研究设计(81%对98%,P=0.02),他们不再觉得研究证据令人困惑(35%对52%,P=0.05),并且在评估研究证据时更有信心(26%对59%,P=0.0001)。他们的平均知识得分从47.3(标准差12.2)提高到57.9(标准差9.0)(P=0.0001)。我们的批判性评估技能研讨会改善了提供循证医疗所需的态度和知识。此类研讨会应纳入研究生妇产科培训计划。