Demakis George J
Department of Psychology, University of North Carolina at Charlotte, 9201 University City Boulevard, Charlotte, NC 28223-0001, USA.
J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2004 May;26(3):441-50. doi: 10.1080/13803390490510149.
The Category Test, Trails B, and the interference task of the Stroop Test are among the most commonly administered measures of frontal lobe functioning and are thought to tap different cognitive functions mediated by these brain regions. Two meta-analyses were conducted on these tests to determine their sensitivity to frontal and lateralized frontal brain damage. Study 1 compared participants with frontal lobe damage to those with damage to posterior brain regions, whereas Study 2 compared participants with left and right frontal lobe damage. For each study, effect sizes based on performance differences between the above groups were calculated for the Category Test, Trail-Making Test Parts A and B, and the Stroop Test, including Word, Color, and Color-Word subtests. In Study 1 significant differences between groups were found for Trails A and all Stroop tasks, but in Study 2 the only difference between left and right frontal participants was on the Stroop Color-Word task. Potential reasons why Trails A and the Stroop Test are sensitive to frontal lobe damage are discussed, such as novelty and processing speed, as are clinical implications of these findings. The challenges of research on assessment of frontal lobe functioning are discussed and new developments in this area are highlighted.
类别测验、连线测验B以及斯特鲁普测验的干扰任务是最常用于评估额叶功能的测试,人们认为这些测试能够考察由这些脑区介导的不同认知功能。针对这些测试进行了两项荟萃分析,以确定它们对额叶及额叶侧化脑损伤的敏感性。研究1将额叶损伤参与者与后脑区域损伤参与者进行了比较,而研究2则比较了左、右额叶损伤的参与者。对于每项研究,针对类别测验、连线测验A和B以及斯特鲁普测验(包括字词、颜色和色词子测验),根据上述组间的表现差异计算效应量。在研究1中,发现连线测验A和所有斯特鲁普任务在组间存在显著差异,但在研究2中,左、右额叶参与者之间的唯一差异在于斯特鲁普色词任务。文中讨论了连线测验A和斯特鲁普测验对额叶损伤敏感的潜在原因,如新颖性和加工速度,还探讨了这些发现的临床意义。文中讨论了额叶功能评估研究的挑战,并强调了该领域的新进展。