Suppr超能文献

热损伤患者的气管切开术:诊断相关组483能否充分估计资源使用情况和医院成本?

Tracheostomy in thermally injured patients: does diagnosis-related group 483 adequately estimate resource use and hospital costs?

作者信息

Kagan Richard J, Gamelli Richard, Kemalyan Nathan, Saffle Jeffrey R

机构信息

Department of Surgery, The University Hospital and University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio 45267-0558, USA.

出版信息

J Trauma. 2004 Oct;57(4):861-6. doi: 10.1097/01.ta.0000100378.29376.91.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

This study compares burn and nonburn patients undergoing tracheostomy, all of whom were assigned to diagnosis-related group 483 to determine hospital reimbursement.

METHODS

We reviewed the records of all inpatients admitted to our hospital from January 2000 through December 2001 who underwent tracheostomy and who were assigned to diagnosis-related group 483. In addition, we compared our burn patient data with that from three other burn centers and the National Burn Repository.

RESULTS

We identified 357 inpatients who had tracheostomies during their hospitalization, only 12 of whom (3.4%) had acute burn injuries. The mean extent of burn in these patients was 43.4% total body surface area. The most frequent primary diagnoses for nonburn patients were injury and poisoning, and circulatory and respiratory disorders. Patients with burn injuries had 39.6 ventilator days, 40.7 intensive care unit days, and 49.2 hospital days compared with 19.8, 17.4, and 29.5 days, respectively, for nonburn patients (p <0.0001). Demographic, resource, and financial data for burn patients treated at the three other burn centers and those reported to the National Burn Repository were not significantly different from burn patients treated at our hospital. Total costs and charges for the care of burn patients were $186,830 and $343,904, respectively, compared with $82,176 and $160,498 for the nonburn patients (p <0.0005).

CONCLUSION

Burn patients requiring tracheostomies during their acute hospitalization consume significantly more resources than patients without burn injuries. More appropriate resource-based reimbursement for the care of these patients appears warranted.

摘要

背景

本研究比较了接受气管切开术的烧伤患者和非烧伤患者,所有患者均被归入诊断相关组483以确定医院报销情况。

方法

我们回顾了2000年1月至2001年12月期间在我院接受气管切开术且被归入诊断相关组483的所有住院患者的记录。此外,我们将烧伤患者的数据与其他三个烧伤中心以及国家烧伤资料库的数据进行了比较。

结果

我们确定了357名住院期间接受气管切开术的患者,其中只有12名(3.4%)有急性烧伤。这些患者的平均烧伤面积为全身表面积的43.4%。非烧伤患者最常见的主要诊断是损伤和中毒以及循环和呼吸系统疾病。烧伤患者的呼吸机使用天数为39.6天,重症监护病房天数为40.7天,住院天数为49.2天,而非烧伤患者分别为19.8天、17.4天和29.5天(p<0.0001)。其他三个烧伤中心治疗的烧伤患者以及向国家烧伤资料库报告的烧伤患者的人口统计学、资源和财务数据与我院治疗的烧伤患者没有显著差异。烧伤患者护理的总成本和收费分别为186,830美元和343,904美元,而非烧伤患者分别为82,176美元和160,498美元(p<0.0005)。

结论

急性住院期间需要气管切开术的烧伤患者比未烧伤患者消耗的资源明显更多。对这些患者的护理进行更合适的基于资源的报销似乎是有必要的。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验