Notzer N, Eldad A, Donchin Y
Medical Education Unit, Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University.
Harefuah. 1992 Jan 1;122(1):47-9.
The system of care delivery of in-field trauma was assessed, leading to suggestions for improving the system and military medical training. This study reports the feasibility and validity of various methods of assessing the performance of Israel Defense Force physicians in administering trauma care. The methods included a standardized medical debriefing with filling in of a report form by a senior traumatologist, his review of the physician's performance, self-assessment by the physician, and a written test. 5 senior traumatologists with extensive experience in military trauma care were trained to assess the physicians' performance within 24-48 hours of incidents involving moderate to severe trauma injuries. 75 physicians who had been involved in the care of the in-field trauma patients during a 1-year period, November 1988 to October 1989, were assessed. Analysis of the results clearly indicated 2 areas for assessment: a) knowledge, mainly levels of comprehension and application in relevant areas of trauma and b) performance, including immediate diagnosis, treatment skills, and triage. The best method for evaluating knowledge was the written test, not peer review nor self-evaluation. However, the traumatologist's evaluation of care performance was highly correlated with the physician's self-assessment. For comprehensive assessment of in-field care it is advisable to integrate the 2 methods: performance review by a traumatologist and a comprehensive written test. Information gained from such assessment could improve the planning of in-service trauma training and the posting of physicians within the military framework.
对战场创伤护理提供系统进行了评估,从而得出了改进该系统及军事医学培训的建议。本研究报告了评估以色列国防军医生在实施创伤护理方面表现的各种方法的可行性和有效性。这些方法包括由资深创伤专家进行标准化医疗汇报并填写报告表、其对医生表现的审查、医生的自我评估以及书面测试。5名在军事创伤护理方面有丰富经验的资深创伤专家接受了培训,以便在涉及中度至重度创伤的事件发生后的24至48小时内评估医生的表现。对1988年11月至1989年10月期间参与战场创伤患者护理工作的75名医生进行了评估。结果分析清楚地表明了两个评估领域:a)知识,主要是在创伤相关领域的理解和应用水平;b)表现,包括即时诊断、治疗技能和分诊。评估知识的最佳方法是书面测试,而非同行评审或自我评估。然而,创伤专家对护理表现的评估与医生的自我评估高度相关。为了对战场护理进行全面评估,建议将两种方法结合起来:由创伤专家进行表现审查和进行全面的书面测试。从这种评估中获得的信息可以改进在职创伤培训的规划以及军队框架内医生的岗位安排。