Stuhlfaut Joshua W, Soto Jorge A, Lucey Brian C, Ulrich Andrew, Rathlev Niels K, Burke Peter A, Hirsch Erwin F
Department of Radiology, Boston University Medical Center, One Boston Medical Center Place, Boston, MA 02118, USA.
Radiology. 2004 Dec;233(3):689-94. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2333031972. Epub 2004 Oct 29.
To retrospectively evaluate multi-detector row computed tomography (CT) without oral contrast material for depiction of bowel and mesenteric injuries that require surgical repair in patients with blunt abdominal trauma.
The investigational review board approved the study. Informed consent was waived. CT reports for October 2001 to September 2003 were reviewed and 1082 patients were identified who had undergone abdominopelvic CT with a multi-detector row scanner and without oral contrast material. Findings were divided into four categories: negative, solid organ injury with or without hemoperitoneum, free fluid only, and suspected bowel or mesenteric injury. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value were calculated by comparing CT findings with laparotomy reports and hospital course.
CT findings were no intraabdominal injury (n = 932), solid organ injury only (n = 102), free fluid only (n = 34), and suspected bowel or mesenteric injury (n = 14). CT findings in patients suspected of having bowel or mesenteric injury were pneumoperitoneum with other secondary findings (n = 4), mesenteric hematoma and bowel wall abnormality (n = 2), mesenteric hematoma only (n = 4), and bowel wall thickening only (n = 4). In 11 patients, bowel or mesenteric injury was proved surgically. Thus, the study included 1066 true-negative, nine true-positive, two false-negative, and five false-positive results. Based on these data, sensitivity was 82% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 52%, 95%), specificity was 99% (95% CI: 98%, 99%), positive predictive value was 64% (95% CI: 39%, 83%), and negative predictive value was 99% (95% CI: 98%, 99%) for depiction of bowel and mesenteric injuries.
Multi-detector row CT without oral contrast material is adequate for depiction of bowel and mesenteric injuries that require surgical repair. Results are comparable with previously reported data for single-detector row helical CT with oral contrast material.
回顾性评估在无口服对比剂情况下,多排螺旋计算机断层扫描(CT)对钝性腹部创伤患者中需要手术修复的肠管和肠系膜损伤的显示情况。
研究获调查审查委员会批准,无需签署知情同意书。回顾了2001年10月至2003年9月的CT报告,确定了1082例接受了多排螺旋扫描仪进行的腹盆腔CT检查且未使用口服对比剂的患者。检查结果分为四类:阴性、伴有或不伴有腹腔积血的实质性脏器损伤、仅有游离液体、疑似肠管或肠系膜损伤。通过将CT检查结果与剖腹手术报告及住院病程进行比较,计算敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值和阴性预测值。
CT检查结果显示无腹腔内损伤(n = 932)、仅有实质性脏器损伤(n = 102)、仅有游离液体(n = 34)以及疑似肠管或肠系膜损伤(n = 14)。疑似肠管或肠系膜损伤患者的CT表现为气腹伴其他继发表现(n = 4)、肠系膜血肿和肠壁异常(n = 2)、仅有肠系膜血肿(n = 4)以及仅有肠壁增厚(n = 4)。11例患者经手术证实存在肠管或肠系膜损伤。因此,本研究包括1066例假阴性、9例假阳性、2例假阴性和5例假阳性结果。基于这些数据,对于肠管和肠系膜损伤的显示,敏感性为82%(95%置信区间[CI]:52%,95%),特异性为99%(95% CI:98%,99%),阳性预测值为64%(95% CI:39%,83%),阴性预测值为99%(95% CI:98%,99%)。
无口服对比剂的多排螺旋CT足以显示需要手术修复的肠管和肠系膜损伤。结果与先前报道的使用口服对比剂的单排螺旋CT数据相当。