Suppr超能文献

较小、较亮且在明视觉条件下指定的刺激下棒状细胞色调偏差的普遍性。

Generality of rod hue biases with smaller, brighter, and photopically specified stimuli.

作者信息

Thomas Laura P, Buck Steven L

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Washington, Seattle 98195-1525, USA.

出版信息

Vis Neurosci. 2004 May-Jun;21(3):257-62.

Abstract

This study tests the generality of previously demonstrated rod hue biases (red and blue biases at shorter wavelengths and a green bias at longer wavelengths) that cause the loci of the three spectral unique hues to shift to longer wavelengths. We found rod hue biases for 2-deg targets to be generally similar in magnitude and light-level dependence to those observed for 7.4-deg targets (the size most often studied) when measured at 7-deg eccentricity. The largest effects for both test sizes occurred at the lowest light levels tested, 1 log scotopic troland. All three rod hue biases were found with 0.6-deg targets, but were not reliably measurable at the lowest light levels and were reduced in magnitude and consistency across observers. The largest rod hue biases all occurred at the same scotopic light level, which corresponds to different photopic light levels for the three hue biases, because of differences in photopic and scotopic spectral sensitivity. This suggests that no single photopic light level will produce such large effects for all three rod hue biases. Finally, when the rod influence on a specific unique-hue locus was measured using photopically (rather than scotopically) constant stimuli, rod hue biases were still found but were more variable in magnitude and incidence across observers. We conclude that the rod hue biases we have previously described can be found with smaller stimuli, at somewhat higher light levels, and under photopically constant conditions, although our prior conditions tend to produce larger, more reliable rod hue biases.

摘要

本研究测试了先前已证明的视杆细胞色调偏差(较短波长处的红色和蓝色偏差以及较长波长处的绿色偏差)的普遍性,这些偏差会导致三种光谱唯一色调的位置向更长波长移动。我们发现,当在7°偏心率下测量时,2°目标的视杆细胞色调偏差在大小和光水平依赖性方面通常与7.4°目标(最常研究的大小)所观察到的相似。对于两种测试大小,最大的影响出现在测试的最低光水平,即1 log暗视 Troland。所有三种视杆细胞色调偏差在0.6°目标中均被发现,但在最低光水平下无法可靠测量,并且在观察者之间其大小和一致性有所降低。所有最大的视杆细胞色调偏差都发生在相同的暗视光水平,由于明视和暗视光谱敏感性的差异,这对应于三种色调偏差的不同明视光水平。这表明没有单一的明视光水平会对所有三种视杆细胞色调偏差产生如此大的影响。最后,当使用明视(而非暗视)恒定刺激测量视杆细胞对特定唯一色调位置的影响时,仍发现了视杆细胞色调偏差,但在观察者之间其大小和发生率更具变异性。我们得出结论,我们之前描述的视杆细胞色调偏差可以在较小的刺激、稍高的光水平以及明视恒定条件下被发现,尽管我们之前的条件往往会产生更大、更可靠的视杆细胞色调偏差。

相似文献

2
Foveal and extra-foveal influences on rod hue biases.
Vis Neurosci. 2006 May-Aug;23(3-4):539-42. doi: 10.1017/S0952523806233509.
3
Do rods influence the hue of foveal stimuli?
Vis Neurosci. 2006 May-Aug;23(3-4):519-23. doi: 10.1017/S0952523806233510.
4
Time course of rod influences on hue perception.
Vis Neurosci. 2008 May-Jun;25(3):517-20. doi: 10.1017/S0952523808080279.
5
Rod hue biases produced on CRT displays.
J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis. 2012 Feb 1;29(2):A36-43. doi: 10.1364/JOSAA.29.000A36.
6
Influence of rod signals on hue perception: evidence from successive scotopic contrast.
Vision Res. 1997 May;37(10):1295-301. doi: 10.1016/s0042-6989(96)00276-3.
7
Rod hue biases for foveal stimuli on CRT displays.
J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis. 2014 Apr 1;31(4):A23-6. doi: 10.1364/JOSAA.31.000A23.
8
Dark versus bright equilibrium hues: rod and cone biases.
J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis. 2014 Apr 1;31(4):A75-81. doi: 10.1364/JOSAA.31.000A75.
9
Time-dependent changes of rod influence on hue perception.
Vision Res. 2002 Jun;42(13):1651-62. doi: 10.1016/s0042-6989(02)00087-1.
10
Unique hue judgments as a function of test size in the fovea and at 20-deg temporal eccentricity.
J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis. 1995 Jun;12(6):1225-32. doi: 10.1364/josaa.12.001225.

引用本文的文献

1
Vision under mesopic and scotopic illumination.
Front Psychol. 2015 Jan 22;5:1594. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01594. eCollection 2014.
2
Rod hue biases for foveal stimuli on CRT displays.
J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis. 2014 Apr 1;31(4):A23-6. doi: 10.1364/JOSAA.31.000A23.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验