Thomas Laura P, Buck Steven L
Department of Psychology, University of Washington, Washington, Seattle, Washington 98195-1525, USA.
Vis Neurosci. 2006 May-Aug;23(3-4):539-42. doi: 10.1017/S0952523806233509.
Green, blue and short-wavelength-red rod hue biases are strongest and most reliable with large, dimly-mesopic, extra-foveal stimuli but tend to diminish when stimuli are confined to a small area of the central fovea. This study explores how the stimulation of foveal and extra-foveal areas interact in determining rod hue biases, and whether large stimuli are as effective for revealing rod hue biases when foveally centered as when eccentrically centered. We assessed rod influence by measuring wavelengths of unique green and unique yellow (with 1-s duration, 1 log scot td stimuli and a staircase procedure) under bleached and dark-adapted conditions. We measured unique hues with foveally centered 2 degrees - and 7.4 degrees -diameter disks, a 7.4 degrees (outer) x 2 degrees (inner) diameter annulus, and a 7 degrees -eccentric, 7.4 degrees -diameter disk. The rod green bias (shift of unique yellow locus) was typically <10 nm and remained fairly constant across spatial configurations, indicating no special foveal influence. The rod blue bias (shift of unique green) varied more among observers and spatial configurations, reaching up to 47 nm. However, stimuli covering the fovea typically produced no rod blue bias. Thus, the present results add differences in spatial dependence (i.e., foveal/extra-foveal interaction) between green and blue rod biases to previously demonstrated differences (e.g., differences in amount of light level dependence, in time course and in the spectral range influenced by each bias).
绿色、蓝色以及短波红色视杆色调偏差在大的、昏暗的中间视觉、中央凹外刺激下最为强烈且可靠,但当刺激局限于中央凹的小区域时,这些偏差往往会减弱。本研究探讨了中央凹和中央凹外区域的刺激在确定视杆色调偏差时如何相互作用,以及当刺激以中央凹为中心时,大刺激对于揭示视杆色调偏差是否与以偏心方式为中心时同样有效。我们通过在漂白和暗适应条件下测量唯一绿色和唯一黄色的波长(持续1秒,1对数暗适应亮度单位刺激以及采用阶梯法)来评估视杆的影响。我们使用以中央凹为中心的直径2度和7.4度的圆盘、外径7.4度×内径2度的圆环以及偏心7度、直径7.4度的圆盘来测量唯一色调。视杆绿色偏差(唯一黄色轨迹的偏移)通常小于10纳米,并且在不同空间配置下保持相当稳定,这表明没有特殊的中央凹影响。视杆蓝色偏差(唯一绿色的偏移)在观察者和空间配置之间变化更大,可达47纳米。然而,覆盖中央凹的刺激通常不会产生视杆蓝色偏差。因此,本研究结果在之前已证明的差异(例如,每种偏差在光水平依赖性、时间进程和受影响的光谱范围方面的差异)基础上,增加了绿色和蓝色视杆偏差在空间依赖性(即中央凹/中央凹外相互作用)方面的差异。