Renner Susanne S
Systematic Botany, Ludwig Maximilians University Munich, Menzinger Strasse 67, D-80638 Munich, Germany.
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2004 Oct 29;359(1450):1485-94. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2004.1530.
Melastomataceae sensu stricto (excluding Memecylaceae) comprise some 3000 species in the neotropics, 1000 in Asia, 240 in Africa, and 230 in Madagascar. Previous family-wide morphological and DNA analyses have shown that the Madagascan species belong to at least three unrelated lineages, which were hypothesized to have arrived by trans-oceanic dispersal. An alternative hypothesis posits that the ancestors of Madagascan, as well as Indian, Melastomataceae arrived from Africa in the Late Cretaceous. This study tests these hypotheses in a Bayesian framework, using three combined sequence datasets analysed under a relaxed clock and simultaneously calibrated with fossils, some not previously used. The new fossil calibration comes from a re-dated possibly Middle or Upper Eocene Brazilian fossil of Melastomeae. Tectonic events were also tentatively used as constraints because of concerns that some of the family's fossils are difficult to assign to nodes in the phylogeny. Regardless of how the data were calibrated, the estimated divergence times of Madagascan and Indian lineages were too young for Cretaceous explanations to hold. This was true even of the oldest ages within the 95% credibility interval around each estimate. Madagascar's Melastomeae appear to have arrived from Africa during the Miocene. Medinilla, with some 70 species in Madagascar and two in Africa, too, arrived during the Miocene, but from Asia. Gravesia, with 100 species in Madagascar and four in east and west Africa, also appears to date to the Miocene, but its monophyly has not been tested. The study afforded an opportunity to compare divergence time estimates obtained earlier with strict clocks and single calibrations, with estimates based on relaxed clocks and different multiple calibrations and taxon sampling.
狭义的野牡丹科(不包括谷木科)在新热带地区约有3000种,在亚洲有1000种,在非洲有240种,在马达加斯加有230种。此前全科范围的形态学和DNA分析表明,马达加斯加的物种至少属于三个不相关的谱系,据推测这些谱系是通过跨洋扩散到达的。另一种假说是,马达加斯加以及印度野牡丹科的祖先在晚白垩世从非洲抵达。本研究在贝叶斯框架下检验了这些假说,使用了三个联合序列数据集,在宽松分子钟下进行分析,并同时用化石进行校准,其中一些化石此前未曾使用。新的化石校准来自一个重新测定年代的可能为始新世中期或晚期的巴西野牡丹族化石。由于担心该科的一些化石难以在系统发育中归到节点上,所以也尝试将构造事件用作约束条件。无论数据如何校准,马达加斯加和印度谱系的估计分歧时间对于白垩世的解释来说都太年轻了,无法成立。即使是每个估计值周围95%可信区间内的最古老年龄也是如此。马达加斯加的野牡丹族似乎是在中新世从非洲抵达的。Medinilla在马达加斯加有大约70种,在非洲也有两种,同样是在中新世从亚洲抵达的。Gravesia在马达加斯加有100种,在东非和西非有4种,似乎也可以追溯到中新世,但其单系性尚未得到检验。这项研究提供了一个机会,可以将早期使用严格分子钟和单一校准获得的分歧时间估计值,与基于宽松分子钟、不同的多重校准和分类群抽样的估计值进行比较。