Pisinger Charlotta, Vestbo Jørgen, Borch-Johnsen Knut, Jørgensen Torben
Research Centre for Prevention and Health, Glostrup University Hospital, DK-2600 Glostrup, Denmark.
Prev Med. 2005 Jan;40(1):112-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2004.05.014.
Smoking reduction has been introduced as an alternative to smokers unable or unwilling to quit but has never been implemented in a population-based intervention.
Two thousand four hundred eight daily smokers in all motivational stages were included in a randomised population-based intervention study, in Copenhagen, Denmark. Smokers, unwilling or unable to quit, were encouraged to reduce their tobacco consumption. Furthermore, smokers in the high-intensity intervention were offered participation in smoking reduction groups.
Twenty-three percent of those who attended both baseline and 1 year visit reported reduction by at least 5 g and 8% reported a halving or more. Halving of tobacco consumption was achieved significantly more often than in the background population, OR = 2.6 (1.6-4.4), even when assuming that non-participants had not reduced, OR = 1.7 (1.0-2.8). Reduction of at least 5 g doubled the probability of increased motivation to quit and a halving increased it more than four times. The reductions were not validated. Less than 2% attended the smoking reduction groups.
The smoking reduction intervention was significant in self-reported reduction of tobacco consumption and subsequently increased motivation to quit. This may open new perspectives, with reduction as a first step towards cessation, a possible supplement to smoking cessation strategies.
减少吸烟已被引入,作为无法或不愿戒烟的吸烟者的一种替代方法,但从未在基于人群的干预中实施过。
在丹麦哥本哈根进行的一项基于人群的随机干预研究中,纳入了2408名处于所有动机阶段的每日吸烟者。鼓励那些不愿或无法戒烟的吸烟者减少烟草消费。此外,高强度干预组的吸烟者被邀请参加减少吸烟小组。
在参加了基线和1年随访的人群中,23%的人报告至少减少了5克,8%的人报告减少了一半或更多。与背景人群相比,烟草消费量减半的情况明显更常见,比值比(OR)=2.6(1.6 - 4.4),即使假设未参与者没有减少吸烟量,OR = 1.7(1.0 - 2.8)。减少至少5克使戒烟动机增加的可能性翻倍,减少一半则使其增加四倍多。这些减少情况未经验证。参加减少吸烟小组的人数不到2%。
减少吸烟干预在自我报告的烟草消费减少方面具有显著效果,随后增加了戒烟动机。这可能开辟新的前景,将减少吸烟作为迈向戒烟的第一步,作为戒烟策略的一种可能补充。