Herrington Lee, Nester Chris
Directorate of Sport, University of Salford, Frederick Road, Allerton Annexe, Salford, Manchester, M6 6PU, UK.
Clin Biomech (Bristol). 2004 Dec;19(10):1070-3. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2004.07.010.
For an accurate quadriceps angle measurement, the patella must be centralised in the femoral trochlear groove, numerous authors have described lateral displacement of the patella in patellofemoral pain patients, this leads to the intriguing possibility that the Q-angle might be undervalued within patellofemoral pain patients who have laterally displaced patella.
109 asymptomatic subjects (51 male, 58 female) were assessed. Medio-lateral patella position was measured using a previous validated method and Q-angle was measured in standing with the quadriceps relaxed.
Mean Q-angle was 11.6 degrees (SD 5.2) left knee, 11.3 degrees (SD 4.9) right knee in the male subjects and 14.4 degrees (SD 5.2) left knee, 13.3 degrees (SD 5.5) right knee for female subjects. 40 females and 28 males had laterally displaced patellae. 13 subjects had centrally placed patellae (7 females, 6 males) with 28 subjects having medially displaced patellae (11 females, 17 males). Recalculation of Q-angle for the laterally displaced group brought about a statistically significant increase in angle. In the medial displaced group failed to produce a statistically significant decrease.
The adjusted Q-angle values for medially and neutral placed patellae brought the values very much into the centre of the reported ranges for Q-angles. After adjustment for lateral patella displacement, Q-angle values were towards the under end of values reported as normal, especially female values which were close to the previously reported pathological cut off point. Because of the inverse relationship between quadriceps strength and the magnitude of Q-angle and quadriceps crucial role in the aetiology of patellofemoral pain, any method which improves the reliability and applicability of Q-angle measurement could prove useful in investigations into the aetiology of and outcome from treatment of patellofemoral pain syndrome.
为了准确测量股四头肌角,髌骨必须位于股骨滑车沟的中心位置,许多作者描述了髌股疼痛患者中髌骨的外侧移位,这引发了一个有趣的可能性,即在髌骨外侧移位的髌股疼痛患者中,股四头肌角可能被低估。
对109名无症状受试者(51名男性,58名女性)进行评估。使用先前验证过的方法测量髌骨的内外侧位置,并在股四头肌放松的站立位测量股四头肌角。
男性受试者左膝平均股四头肌角为11.6度(标准差5.2),右膝为11.3度(标准差4.9);女性受试者左膝平均股四头肌角为14.4度(标准差5.2),右膝为13.3度(标准差5.5)。40名女性和28名男性存在髌骨外侧移位。13名受试者的髌骨位置居中(7名女性,6名男性),28名受试者的髌骨内侧移位(11名女性,17名男性)。对外侧移位组的股四头肌角重新计算后,角度有统计学意义的增加。在内侧移位组中未能产生统计学意义的降低。
对内侧和位置正常的髌骨调整后的股四头肌角值使其非常接近报道的股四头肌角范围的中心。在调整髌骨外侧移位后,股四头肌角值趋向于报道的正常范围的下限,尤其是女性的值接近先前报道的病理临界点。由于股四头肌力量与股四头肌角大小之间的反比关系以及股四头肌在髌股疼痛病因中的关键作用,任何提高股四头肌角测量可靠性和适用性的方法都可能在髌股疼痛综合征的病因研究和治疗结果研究中证明是有用的。