Schectman Joel M, Schorling John B, Nadkarni Mohan M, Lyman Jason A, Siadaty Mir S, Voss John D
Department of Medicine, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA 22908, USA.
Am J Med Qual. 2004 Sep-Oct;19(5):207-13. doi: 10.1177/106286060401900505.
The objective was to evaluate whether physician feedback accompanied by an action checklist improved diabetes care process measures. Eighty-three physicians in an academic general medicine clinic were provided a single feedback report on the most recent date and result of diabetes care measures (glycosylated hemoglobin [A1c], urine microalbumin, serum creatinine, lipid levels, retinal examination) as well as recent diabetes medication refills with calculated dosing and adherence on 789 patients. An educational session regarding the feedback and adherence information was provided. The physicians were asked to complete a checklist accompanying the feedback on each of their patients, indicating requested actions with respect to follow-up, testing, and counseling. The physicians completed 82% of patient checklists, requesting actions consistent with patient needs on the basis of the feedback. Of the physicians, 93% felt the patient information and intervention format to be useful. The odds of urine microalbumin testing, serum creatinine, lipid profile, A1c, and retinal examination increased in the 6 months after the feedback. The increase was sustained at 1 year only for microalbumin and retinal exams. There was no significant change in refill adherence for the group overall after the feedback, although adherence did improve among patients of physicians attending the educational session. No significant change was noted in lipid or A1c levels during the study period. In conclusion, a simple physician feedback tool with action checklist can be both helpful and popular for improving rates of diabetes care guideline adherence. More complex interventions are likely required to improve diabetes outcomes.
目的是评估附有行动清单的医生反馈是否能改善糖尿病护理流程指标。为一家学术性普通内科诊所的83名医生提供了一份关于糖尿病护理指标(糖化血红蛋白[A1c]、尿微量白蛋白、血清肌酐、血脂水平、视网膜检查)的最新日期和结果的单一反馈报告,以及789名患者最近的糖尿病药物 refill情况,包括计算出的剂量和依从性。提供了一次关于反馈和依从性信息的教育课程。要求医生在针对每位患者的反馈中填写一份清单,注明随访、检测和咨询方面的要求行动。医生完成了82%的患者清单,根据反馈要求采取了与患者需求一致的行动。在这些医生中,93%认为患者信息和干预形式有用。反馈后的6个月内,尿微量白蛋白检测、血清肌酐、血脂谱、A1c和视网膜检查的几率增加。仅尿微量白蛋白和视网膜检查在1年后增加得以持续。反馈后该组总体上药物 refill依从性没有显著变化,尽管参加教育课程的医生的患者中依从性有所改善。在研究期间,血脂或A1c水平没有显著变化。总之,一个带有行动清单的简单医生反馈工具对于提高糖尿病护理指南依从率既有用又受欢迎。可能需要更复杂的干预措施来改善糖尿病治疗效果。