• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

嗅觉地图:气味感知的共性得到证实。

The smell map: commonality of odour perception confirmed.

作者信息

Dawes P J D, Dawes M T, Williams S M

机构信息

Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand.

出版信息

Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci. 2004 Dec;29(6):648-54. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2273.2004.00873.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.1365-2273.2004.00873.x
PMID:15533153
Abstract

We have examined the repeatability of a perceptual space, or smell map, initially developed in a sample of 20 people. A total of 110 normosmic people performed similarity ratings for pairs of the 11 commonly encountered odours used in the previous study. Multidimensional scaling was again used to analyse the relationships between odours. Some individual plots and an archetype, generated using the data from all participants, produced results similar to the previous study, confirming the ability to obtain reproducible results using a different tester and different participants. Exploration of the source space, that is, the spatial distribution of the individual plots relative to each other, suggests that the current model explains about 50% of the variation between subjects for the two-dimensional solution and 57% for the three-dimensional solution.

摘要

我们检验了最初在20人样本中开发的感知空间或气味图谱的可重复性。共有110名嗅觉正常的人对先前研究中使用的11种常见气味的两两组合进行了相似性评级。再次使用多维标度法来分析气味之间的关系。使用所有参与者的数据生成的一些个体图和一个原型产生了与先前研究相似的结果,证实了使用不同的测试者和不同的参与者能够获得可重复的结果。对源空间的探索,即个体图相对于彼此的空间分布,表明当前模型对于二维解解释了约50%的个体间变异,对于三维解解释了57%的个体间变异。

相似文献

1
The smell map: commonality of odour perception confirmed.嗅觉地图:气味感知的共性得到证实。
Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci. 2004 Dec;29(6):648-54. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2273.2004.00873.x.
2
The smell map: is there a commonality of odour perception?嗅觉图谱:气味感知存在共性吗?
Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci. 1999 Jun;24(3):184-9. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2273.1999.00242.x.
3
Are olfactory images sensory in nature?嗅觉意象本质上是感官性的吗?
Perception. 2006;35(12):1699-708. doi: 10.1068/p5453.
4
Reduced discriminability following perceptual learning with odours.气味感知学习后辨别能力下降。
Perception. 2004;33(1):113-9. doi: 10.1068/p5044.
5
The accessibility of semantic knowledge for odours that can and cannot be named.对于可命名和不可命名气味的语义知识的可及性。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2013;66(7):1414-31. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2012.753097. Epub 2012 Dec 21.
6
Is the odour identification deficit in schizophrenia influenced by odour hedonics?精神分裂症患者的气味识别缺陷是否受气味享乐主义影响?
Cogn Neuropsychiatry. 2011 Sep;16(5):448-60. doi: 10.1080/13546805.2011.552561. Epub 2011 May 24.
7
Odour suppression in binary mixtures.二元混合物中的气味抑制
Biol Psychol. 2006 Oct;73(3):288-97. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2006.05.002. Epub 2006 Jul 5.
8
Selection of odorants for memory tests on the basis of familiarity, perceived complexity, pleasantness, similarity and identification.基于熟悉度、感知复杂性、愉悦度、相似度和识别度来选择用于记忆测试的气味剂。
Chem Senses. 2002 May;27(4):307-17. doi: 10.1093/chemse/27.4.307.
9
Experience dependent changes in odour-viscosity perception.气味-粘度感知中依赖于经验的变化。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2011 Jan;136(1):60-6. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2010.10.001. Epub 2010 Oct 28.
10
Phenomenological differences between familiar and unfamiliar odours.熟悉气味与不熟悉气味之间的现象学差异。
Perception. 2007;36(6):931-47. doi: 10.1068/p5624.

引用本文的文献

1
Measurement of chemosensory function.化学感应功能的测量。
World J Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2018 Jun 28;4(1):11-28. doi: 10.1016/j.wjorl.2018.03.001. eCollection 2018 Mar.
2
Predicting odorant quality perceptions from multidimensional scaling of olfactory bulb glomerular activity patterns.从嗅球肾小球活动模式的多维标度预测气味质量感知。
Behav Neurosci. 2006 Dec;120(6):1337-45. doi: 10.1037/0735-7044.120.6.1337.