• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一种新型双直径输尿管镜工作通道:对灌洗液流动的影响。

A novel dual-diameter ureteroscope working channel: impact on irrigant flow.

作者信息

Monga Manoj, Hendlin Kari, Skenazy Jason, Ramani Anup

机构信息

Department of Urologic Surgery, University of Minnesota Medical School and the VAHCS Minneapolis, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455, USA.

出版信息

Urology. 2004 Nov;64(5):892-4. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2004.06.026.

DOI:10.1016/j.urology.2004.06.026
PMID:15533472
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To compare irrigant flow characteristics through standard working channels (3.6F to 4.5F) and a dual-diameter working channel. Irrigant flow is critical for adequate visualization during endoscopic procedures.

METHODS

Working channels were created out of 80 cm of light wall polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) tubing (inner diameter 3.6F, 4.0F, and 4.5F) with a male Luer connector attached to one end by epoxy resin. The dual-diameter working channel was created with a 70-cm segment of PTFE (4.5F inner diameter, 0.059 in.) and a 10-cm segment of PTFE (3.6F inner diameter, 0.047 in.) with a male Luer connector attached to the free end of the 4.5F tubing. Stone basket shafts (100 cm in length, outer diameter 1.9F, 2.4F, and 3.0F) were created out of unmodified polyimide tubing with a 0.018-in.-diameter nitinol mandrel epoxy core for stability. Irrigant flow was measured at 100 mm Hg pressure for 1 minute with an empty channel and with stone basket shafts in the channel.

RESULTS

The flow rates were significantly greater with the dual-diameter working channel than with the standard flexible ureteroscope (3.6F) working channel using an empty channel (79.2 versus 44.1 mL/min, P = 0.0001), 1.9F basket (35.9 versus 10.0 mL/min, P = 0.003), 2.4F basket (20.7 versus 4.3 mL/min, P = 0.002), and 3.0F basket (6.0 versus 0.7 mL/min, P = 0.0002) sheath.

CONCLUSIONS

A dual-diameter working channel may optimize irrigant flow characteristics for flexible ureteroscopes while maintaining a small distal tip diameter.

摘要

目的

比较冲洗液通过标准工作通道(3.6F至4.5F)和双直径工作通道的流动特性。冲洗液流动对于内镜手术期间的充分可视化至关重要。

方法

用80厘米的薄壁聚四氟乙烯(PTFE)管(内径3.6F、4.0F和4.5F)制作工作通道,一端通过环氧树脂连接一个公鲁尔接头。双直径工作通道由一段70厘米的PTFE(内径4.5F,0.059英寸)和一段10厘米的PTFE(内径3.6F,0.047英寸)制成,公鲁尔接头连接到4.5F管的自由端。用未改性的聚酰亚胺管制作结石篮轴(长度100厘米,外径1.9F、2.4F和3.0F),内部有一个直径0.018英寸的镍钛诺芯棒环氧树脂芯以保持稳定性。在通道为空和通道中有结石篮轴的情况下,在100毫米汞柱压力下测量冲洗液流动1分钟。

结果

使用空通道时,双直径工作通道的流速显著高于标准软性输尿管镜(3.6F)工作通道(79.2对44.1毫升/分钟,P = 0.0001);使用1.9F篮时(35.9对10.0毫升/分钟,P = 0.003);使用2.4F篮时(20.7对4.3毫升/分钟,P = 0.002);使用3.0F篮时(6.0对0.7毫升/分钟,P = 0.0002)。

结论

双直径工作通道可优化软性输尿管镜的冲洗液流动特性,同时保持较小的远端尖端直径。

相似文献

1
A novel dual-diameter ureteroscope working channel: impact on irrigant flow.一种新型双直径输尿管镜工作通道:对灌洗液流动的影响。
Urology. 2004 Nov;64(5):892-4. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2004.06.026.
2
Irrigant flow and intrarenal pressure during flexible ureteroscopy: the effect of different access sheaths, working channel instruments, and hydrostatic pressure.在软性输尿管镜检查期间的灌洗流量和肾内压:不同的通道鞘、工作通道器械和静水压力的影响。
J Endourol. 2010 Dec;24(12):1915-20. doi: 10.1089/end.2010.0188. Epub 2010 Nov 10.
3
Is there a role for small-diameter ureteral access sheaths? Impact on irrigant flow and intrapelvic pressures.小直径输尿管通路鞘有作用吗?对冲洗液流量和肾盂内压力的影响。
Urology. 2004 Sep;64(3):439-41; discussion 441-2. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2004.04.060.
4
Comparison of flexible ureteroscopes: deflection, irrigant flow and optical characteristics.可弯曲输尿管镜的比较:偏转、灌流及光学特性
J Urol. 2005 Jun;173(6):2017-21. doi: 10.1097/01.ju.0000158139.65771.0a.
5
Alteration in irrigant flow and deflection of flexible ureteroscopes with nitinol baskets.使用镍钛合金网篮时冲洗液流量的改变及软性输尿管镜的偏转
J Endourol. 2006 Jan;20(1):74-7. doi: 10.1089/end.2006.20.74.
6
A dual-channel flexible ureteroscope: evaluation of deflection, flow, illumination, and optics.双通道软性输尿管镜:弯曲性能、水流、照明和光学性能评估。
J Endourol. 2011 Sep;25(9):1411-4. doi: 10.1089/end.2010.0642. Epub 2011 Jul 28.
7
Bare naked baskets: ureteroscope deflection and flow characteristics with intact and disassembled ureteroscopic nitinol stone baskets.裸露的篮子:完整和拆解的输尿管镜镍钛诺结石篮的输尿管镜偏转及流动特性
J Urol. 2002 Jun;167(6):2377-9.
8
Comparison of Peditrol irrigation device and common methods of irrigation.佩迪特罗冲洗装置与常规冲洗方法的比较。
J Endourol. 2005 Jun;19(5):562-5. doi: 10.1089/end.2005.19.562.
9
Critical analysis of the miniaturized stone basket: effect on deflection and flow rate.微型取石篮的关键分析:对偏斜和流速的影响。
J Endourol. 2012 Mar;26(3):275-7. doi: 10.1089/end.2011.0166. Epub 2011 Oct 24.
10
Evaluation of a Novel Single-Use Flexible Ureteroscope.新型一次性使用软性输尿管镜的评估。
J Endourol. 2021 Jun;35(6):903-907. doi: 10.1089/end.2016.0237. Epub 2017 Mar 2.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparing outcomes of single-use vs reusable ureteroscopes: a systematic review and meta analysis.比较一次性使用输尿管镜与可重复使用输尿管镜的治疗效果:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Urolithiasis. 2024 Feb 28;52(1):37. doi: 10.1007/s00240-024-01537-8.