Pablos Ana I, Escobar Ismael, Albiñana Sandra, Serrano Olga, Ferrari José M, Herreros de Tejada Alberto
Pharmacy Department, Doce de Octubre University Hospital, Madrid, Spain.
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2005 Jan;14(1):53-9. doi: 10.1002/pds.1042.
This study was designed to analyse the drug consumption difference and economic impact of an antibiotic sequential therapy focused on quinolones.
We studied the consumption of quinolones (ofloxacin/levofloxacin and ciprofloxacin) 6 months before and after the implementation of a sequential therapy program in hospitalised patients. It was calculated for each antibiotic, in its oral and intravenous forms, in defined daily dose (DDD/100 stays per day) and economical terms (drug acquisition cost). At the beginning of the program ofloxacin was replaced by levofloxacin and, since their clinical uses are similar, the consumption of both drugs was compared during the period.
In economic terms, the consumption of intravenous quinolones decreased 60% whereas the consumption of oral quinolones increased 66%. In DDD/100 stays per day, intravenous forms consumption decreased 53% and oral forms consumption increased 36%.
Focusing on quinolones, the implementation of a sequential therapy program based on promoting an early switch from intravenous to oral regimen has proved its capacity to alter the utilisation profile of these antibiotics. The program has permitted the hospital a global saving of 41420 dollars for these drugs during the period of time considered.
本研究旨在分析以喹诺酮类药物为主的抗生素序贯疗法的药物消费差异及经济影响。
我们研究了在住院患者中实施序贯治疗方案前后6个月喹诺酮类药物(氧氟沙星/左氧氟沙星和环丙沙星)的消费情况。计算了每种抗生素口服和静脉注射形式的限定日剂量(DDD/每天100例住院日)及经济成本(药品采购成本)。在该方案开始时,氧氟沙星被左氧氟沙星取代,由于它们的临床用途相似,在此期间对两种药物的消费情况进行了比较。
从经济角度来看,静脉注射喹诺酮类药物的消费量下降了60%,而口服喹诺酮类药物的消费量增加了66%。以DDD/每天100例住院日计算,静脉注射形式的消费量下降了53%,口服形式的消费量增加了36%。
以喹诺酮类药物为主,基于促进从静脉注射方案尽早转换为口服方案的序贯治疗方案的实施,已证明其有能力改变这些抗生素的使用模式。在本研究期间,该方案使医院在这些药物上节省了总计41420美元。