Roos Thomas Christian, Geuer Stefan, Roos Sabine, Brost Harald
Reha Klinik Neuharlingersiel, Interdisciplinary Therapy Center for Allergies, Skin- and Lung-Diseases, Neuharlingersiel, Germany.
Drugs. 2004;64(23):2639-66. doi: 10.2165/00003495-200464230-00003.
A wide range of different therapeutic regimens are used for atopic dermatitis. Although many treatment modalities are well established worldwide among clinicians, only the minority of these therapy recommendations are based on results of randomised controlled trials (RCTs). To close the gap between such 'generally' recommended therapies and therapies that are based on data from controlled trials, this review focuses not only on the pharmacological and clinical aspects of the currently proven agents, but also on the advantages and disadvantages of therapies that have not yet been completely tested.A review of the available literature concerning the pharmacological profile and also the level of evidence of therapeutic efficacy of all currently known topical and systemic agents for the treatment of atopic dermatitis reveals a large gap between the knowledge concerning the pharmacological action in vitro and the evidence of clinical efficacy in many cases. We agree with the conclusion of previous reviews that numerous therapies for atopic dermatitis urgently require more independent RCTs and especially comparative trials (e.g. corticosteroids vs calcineurin inhibitors). These are required in order to facilitate the choice of therapeutic strategy for the individual treatment of atopic dermatitis, with its broad spectrum of clinical manifestations and potential complications in adult patients and, particularly, in children.Finally, we also review preclinical trials with several new drugs. Immunomodulators appear to promise a new dimension for the future of therapy for atopic dermatitis, especially for severe and otherwise refractory forms or as alternatives to corticosteroids, that is, to treat facial atopic eczema without the risk of adverse effects.
广泛的不同治疗方案被用于特应性皮炎。尽管许多治疗方式在全球临床医生中已得到广泛认可,但这些治疗建议中只有少数是基于随机对照试验(RCT)的结果。为了弥合此类“一般”推荐疗法与基于对照试验数据的疗法之间的差距,本综述不仅关注当前已证实药物的药理和临床方面,还关注尚未经过全面测试的疗法的优缺点。对所有目前已知的用于治疗特应性皮炎的局部和全身药物的药理特性以及治疗效果的证据水平的现有文献进行综述发现,在许多情况下,体外药理作用的知识与临床疗效的证据之间存在很大差距。我们同意先前综述的结论,即特应性皮炎的众多疗法迫切需要更多独立的RCT,尤其是比较试验(例如皮质类固醇与钙调神经磷酸酶抑制剂)。这些试验是为了便于为特应性皮炎的个体化治疗选择治疗策略,特应性皮炎在成年患者尤其是儿童中具有广泛的临床表现和潜在并发症。最后,我们还综述了几种新药的临床前试验。免疫调节剂似乎为特应性皮炎的未来治疗带来了新的维度,特别是对于严重的和其他难治性形式或作为皮质类固醇的替代品,即治疗面部特应性湿疹而无不良反应风险。