Chait Maria, Simon Jonathan Z, Poeppel David
Neuroscience and Cognitive Science Program, University of Maryland, 1401 Marie Mount Hall, College Park, MD 20742, USA.
Neuroreport. 2004 Nov 15;15(16):2455-8. doi: 10.1097/00001756-200411150-00004.
The functional significance of the M50 and M100 auditory evoked fields remains unclear. Here we report auditory evoked field data from three different studies employing wide-band noise stimuli. We find that, for the same stimuli, the strength of the M100, as well as its lateralization, are task-modulated. The M50, in contrast, shows three properties: It is dramatically more pronounced for noise stimuli than for pure tones, does not seem to be task dependent, and, is significantly stronger in the left hemisphere in all task conditions. These contrasting patterns of activation shed light on the properties of the response-generating mechanisms and suggest roles in the process of auditory figure-ground segregation.
M50和M100听觉诱发电场的功能意义仍不明确。在此,我们报告了三项采用宽带噪声刺激的不同研究的听觉诱发电场数据。我们发现,对于相同的刺激,M100的强度及其侧向化会受到任务调制。相比之下,M50表现出三个特性:它在噪声刺激下比纯音刺激下明显更显著,似乎不依赖于任务,并且在所有任务条件下左半球的强度都明显更强。这些不同的激活模式揭示了反应生成机制的特性,并暗示了其在听觉图形-背景分离过程中的作用。