Suppr超能文献

[精神分裂症、糖尿病与抗精神病药物]

[Schizophrenia, diabetes mellitus and antipsychotics].

作者信息

Gury C

机构信息

Service de Pharmacie Clinique, Centre Hospitalier Sainte-Anne, 1, rue Cabanis, Paris 14, USA.

出版信息

Encephale. 2004 Jul-Aug;30(4):382-91. doi: 10.1016/s0013-7006(04)95452-8.

Abstract

During the last years, a contribution of antipsychotic drugs in the increase of diabetes prevalence in schizophrenic population has been repetitively suggested. The debate focused mainly on the second-generation antipsychotics. The analysis of the scientific literature indicates however that this discussion is not recent and an increase of diabetes prevalence in schizophrenic populations was already described before the introduction of neuroleptics. Then, after the introduction of the first neuroleptics in the 1950s, an increase of diabetes prevalence was reported among treated patients and the same alarms occurred in the 1990s after the introduction of second-generation antipsychotics. These treatments were related to an increase of glucose tolerance impairment, type II diabetes and diabetic acidoketosis. Recent epidemiological studies have confirmed the increase prevalence of diabetes in schizophrenic patients, particularly in schizophrenic patients before any antipsychotic treatment. Among the suggested mechanisms, there are sedentary life (due to hospitalisation and sedative effects of neuroleptics), food imbalance, shared genetic factors for diabetes and schizophrenia. Moreover, the frequency of the metabolic syndrome is increased in schizophrenic populations. This syndrome associates blood glucose increase, lipid metabolism disorders and android obesity. This could explain--via an increase of the cortisol production--the increase of mortality due to cardiovascular diseases observed in schizoprhenic patients. Thus, it seems well established that schizophrenia is associated with an increased risk for diabetes. It is however more difficult to evaluate the role of antipsychotic treatment as a causative factor of diabetes. Indeed, there are many published case reports or diabetes or diabetic acidoketosis after an antipsychotic treatment, but the level of evidence in controlled trials is low. Many studies were performed on large databases, but were retrospective and subjected to many flaws: concomitant diseases not taken into account, diabetes status evaluated by drug consumption, unknown diabetes status before antipsychotic treatment, etc. In the few prospective studies performed, no significant differences between the atypical versus typical antipsychotics were evidenced for new cases of diabetes. Moreover, in general population, the glucose tolerance impairment is underdiagnosed and it is estimated that people with a glucose tolerance impairment have a 5-10% annual risk of type II diabetes. Thus, this concern has to be replaced among the world epidemic increase of diabetes and in a population of patients whose the disease itself and life style are risk factors for diabetes. Some studies have explored the pathophysiological mechanisms that could support a diabetogenic effect of antipsychotics. Although it does not seem to be a direct effect of antipsychotics on insulin secretion by pancreatic cells, body weight increase has been evidence for both typical and atypical antipsychotics. However, it remains unclear whether this weight increase is responsible for a visceral adiposity, which is a risk factor better fitted to the cardiovascular mortality tha the body weight itself. Other hypotheses involving an effect on the leptin, which regulates the appetite, have been proposed. In waiting of new prospective controlled studies, and without denying the impact of antipsychotics on the glucose and lipid metabolisms (on the weight increase, for example), it should be recognized that the benefit/risk ratio remains largely in favour of the treatment, particularly for the atypical antipsychotics, more effective and better tolerated at the neurological level than the conventional antipsychotics. One of the benefits of the mainly articles in professional media about this concern is to draw attention on the metabolism disorders in schizophrenic patients, which are important risk factor of their frequent cardiovascular surmortality whatever the causes. Consequently, it is advised to monitor glucose and lipid metabolisms of schizophrenic patients before and during their treatment (body weight, fast blood glucose, blood cholesterol and triglycerides). In conclusion, schizophrenic patients are a population with an increased metabolic risk, which is a cause of their increased mortality. Although these data are known since a long time ago, this population does not benefit from the same metabolic follow-up than the non-schizophrenic population. The debate on the possible relationship between diabetes and antipsychotics should be also taken as a helpful recall of the necessity to follow simple rules of prevention and monitoring in this at-risk population. This should make it possible to preserve the benefit of the antipsychotics, the contribution of which in the treatment of schizophrenia is not any more to demonstrate.

摘要

在过去几年中,抗精神病药物在精神分裂症患者群体中导致糖尿病患病率增加这一观点被反复提及。争论主要集中在第二代抗精神病药物上。然而,对科学文献的分析表明,这一讨论并非近期才出现,早在抗精神病药物引入之前,就已有人描述精神分裂症患者群体中糖尿病患病率的增加。然后,在20世纪50年代第一代抗精神病药物引入后,有报道称接受治疗的患者中糖尿病患病率增加,在20世纪90年代第二代抗精神病药物引入后同样出现了此类警示。这些治疗与糖耐量损害、II型糖尿病和糖尿病酮症酸中毒的增加有关。近期的流行病学研究证实了精神分裂症患者中糖尿病患病率的增加,尤其是在未接受任何抗精神病药物治疗的精神分裂症患者中。在提出的机制中,有久坐不动的生活方式(由于住院和抗精神病药物的镇静作用)、饮食不均衡、糖尿病和精神分裂症共同的遗传因素。此外,精神分裂症患者群体中代谢综合征的发生率增加。该综合征伴有血糖升高、脂质代谢紊乱和腹部肥胖。这可以通过皮质醇分泌增加来解释精神分裂症患者中观察到的心血管疾病死亡率的增加。因此,精神分裂症与糖尿病风险增加之间的关联似乎已得到充分证实。然而,评估抗精神病药物治疗作为糖尿病致病因素的作用则更为困难。确实,有许多已发表的病例报告显示抗精神病药物治疗后出现糖尿病或糖尿病酮症酸中毒,但对照试验中的证据水平较低。许多研究是在大型数据库上进行的,但都是回顾性的,存在许多缺陷:未考虑合并疾病、通过药物消耗评估糖尿病状态、抗精神病药物治疗前糖尿病状态未知等。在进行的少数前瞻性研究中,未发现非典型抗精神病药物与典型抗精神病药物在糖尿病新发病例方面有显著差异。此外,在普通人群中,糖耐量损害的诊断不足,据估计糖耐量损害人群每年患II型糖尿病的风险为5 - 10%。因此,在全球糖尿病流行增加以及该疾病本身和生活方式都是糖尿病风险因素的患者群体中,必须重新审视这一问题。一些研究探讨了可能支持抗精神病药物致糖尿病作用的病理生理机制。虽然抗精神病药物似乎并非直接作用于胰腺细胞的胰岛素分泌,但体重增加在典型和非典型抗精神病药物中均有体现。然而,目前尚不清楚这种体重增加是否会导致内脏肥胖,而内脏肥胖是比体重本身更适合解释心血管死亡率的一个风险因素。还提出了其他涉及对调节食欲的瘦素产生影响的假说。在等待新的前瞻性对照研究结果时,且不否认抗精神病药物对葡萄糖和脂质代谢的影响(例如对体重增加的影响),应该认识到获益/风险比在很大程度上仍有利于治疗,特别是对于非典型抗精神病药物,其在神经学层面比传统抗精神病药物更有效且耐受性更好。专业媒体上关于这一问题的主要文章的好处之一是引起人们对精神分裂症患者代谢紊乱的关注,无论原因如何,代谢紊乱都是他们频繁出现心血管超额死亡率的重要风险因素。因此,建议在精神分裂症患者治疗前和治疗期间监测其葡萄糖和脂质代谢(体重、空腹血糖、血胆固醇和甘油三酯)。总之,精神分裂症患者是代谢风险增加的群体,这是其死亡率增加的一个原因。尽管这些数据早已为人所知,但该群体并未像非精神分裂症群体那样接受相同的代谢随访。关于糖尿病与抗精神病药物之间可能关系的争论也应被视为对在这一高危人群中遵循简单预防和监测规则必要性的有益提醒。这应该能够保留抗精神病药物的益处,其在精神分裂症治疗中的作用已无需再证明。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验