Guo Ming, Hu Lulin, Baliga Mithra, He Z, Hughson Michael D
Department of Pathology, University of Mississippi, Medical Center, Jackson, MS 39216, USA.
Am J Clin Pathol. 2004 Dec;122(6):894-901. doi: 10.1309/0DGG-QBDQ-AMJC-JBXB.
We performed p16(INK4a) immunocytochemical analysis and Hybrid Capture 2 (HC2; Digene, Gaithersburg, MD) high-risk HPV testing on 210 abnormal SurePath (TriPath Imaging, Burlington, NC) Papanicolaou specimens diagnosed as low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (LSIL) or high grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (HSIL). The results were compared with 121 follow-up biopsy specimens. p16(INK4a) was positive in 57.9% of women with LSIL compared with 97.1% of women with HSIL. In contrast, HC2 testing was positive in 85.0% of women with LSIL and 86.4% of women with HSIL. The differences in the positive rates for16(INK4a) between LSIL and HSIL was significant (P < .001), whereas, for HC2, it was not (P = .264). In patients who had cervical biopsies following a cytologic diagnosis of LSIL, the positive predictive value (PPV) of p16(INK4a) for a biopsy of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 or 3 (CIN2/3; 33.3%) was significantly higher than the PPV of HC2 results (21.2%) (P < .001). Using liquid-based cytology specimens, p16(INK4a) immunocytochemical analysis has a higher PPV than reflex HC2 HPV testing for identifying CIN2/3 among patients with LSIL and might be useful for selecting patients with LSIL for colposcopy.
我们对210份经SurePath(TriPath Imaging公司,北卡罗来纳州伯灵顿市)处理、诊断为低级别鳞状上皮内病变(LSIL)或高级别鳞状上皮内病变(HSIL)的异常巴氏涂片标本进行了p16(INK4a)免疫细胞化学分析和杂交捕获2代(HC2;Digene公司,马里兰州盖瑟斯堡市)高危型人乳头瘤病毒检测。将结果与121份随访活检标本进行比较。LSIL女性患者中57.9%的p16(INK4a)呈阳性,而HSIL女性患者中这一比例为97.1%。相比之下,HC2检测在LSIL女性患者中的阳性率为85.0%,在HSIL女性患者中的阳性率为86.4%。LSIL和HSIL之间p16(INK4a)阳性率的差异具有统计学意义(P <.001),而HC2的差异则无统计学意义(P = 0.264)。在经细胞学诊断为LSIL后进行宫颈活检的患者中,p16(INK4a)对宫颈上皮内瘤变2级或3级(CIN2/3)活检的阳性预测值(PPV)(33.3%)显著高于HC2检测结果的PPV(21.2%)(P <.001)。对于液基细胞学标本,p16(INK4a)免疫细胞化学分析在识别LSIL患者中的CIN2/3方面比HC2 HPV检测的PPV更高,可能有助于选择LSIL患者进行阴道镜检查。