• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

胸膜内注射葡萄球菌超抗原可促使恶性胸腔积液消退,并使非小细胞肺癌患者获得生存益处。

Intrapleural staphylococcal superantigen induces resolution of malignant pleural effusions and a survival benefit in non-small cell lung cancer.

作者信息

Ren Shaohua, Terman David S, Bohach Greg, Silvers Abraham, Hansen Chris, Colt Henri, Sahn Steven A

机构信息

Division of Pulmonary & Critical Care Medicine, 96 Lucas St, Box 250630, Charleston, SC 29425, USA.

出版信息

Chest. 2004 Nov;126(5):1529-39. doi: 10.1378/chest.126.5.1529.

DOI:10.1378/chest.126.5.1529
PMID:15539723
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Malignant pleural effusion (MPE) may occur in up to 50% of patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The majority of these patients have a poor performance status and a dismal prognosis, with survival duration ranging from 2 to 3 months. Since these patients are typically symptomatic from their MPE, prompt treatment is required. Patients with symptomatic MPE from NSCLC and poor performance scores (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group [ECOG] score >/= 2, Karnofsky performance status [KPS] score < 50) are generally not offered systemic chemotherapy. Treatment is palliative and includes intrapleural catheter drainage or chemical pleurodesis with talc, doxycycline, or bleomycin. None of the latter modalities prolong survival.

OBJECTIVE

Our goal was to investigate the toxicity and therapeutic effect of a new therapeutic agent, Staphylococcus aureus superantigen (SSAg), a powerful T-cell stimulant administered intrapleurally to unselected, consecutive patients with MPE from NSCLC (stage IIIb with pleural effusion) and a poor performance status. By providing direct access of the SSAg to the bronchial and mediastinal lymphatics, we predicted that intrapleural administration of SSAg would induce resolution of MPE and prolong survival in this population with advanced NSCLC and a limited prognosis.

METHODS

Fourteen consecutive, unselected patients with MPE from NSCLC and a median pretreatment KPS score of 40 (range, 10 to 60) received pleural instillation of SSAg, 100 to 400 pg, once or twice weekly (mean, 3.7 +/- 1.3 treatments [+/- SD]) until the pleural effusions resolved. They were evaluated for drug toxicity, resolution, duration of MPE, and survival.

RESULTS

Other than mild fever (maximum grade 2), toxicity of SSAg treatment was trivial and notably devoid of respiratory distress or hypotension. Eleven patients had a complete response (CR), and 3 patients had a partial response of their MPE. In 12 patients, the response endured for > 90 days, with a median time to recurrence of 5 months (range, 3 to 23 months). The median survival for the SSAg-treated group was 7.9 months (range, 2 to 36 months; 95% confidence interval [CI], 5.9 to 11.4 months), compared to a median survival of 2.5 months (range, 0.1 to 57 months; 95% CI, 1.3 to 3.4 months) for 18 consecutive, unselected patients with MPE from NSCLC (stage IIIb) treated with talc poudrage (p = 0.044). Survival duration of all 14 SSAg-treated cases and 13 talc-poudrage-treated patients with comparable pretreatment KPS (range, 10 to 60; median, 40 and 30, respectively), and distribution (p = 0.5) was 7.9 months (95% CI, 5.9 to 11.4 months) and 2.0 months (95% CI, 0.4 to 2.9 months), respectively (p = 0.0023). Nine of 14 patients treated with SSAg survived > 6 months, 4 patients survived > 9 months, and 3 patients survived > 350 days. One of the patients in the CR group has survived 36 months. None of the 13 talc-treated patients survived > 6 months.

INTERPRETATION

In 14 unselected, consecutive patients with MPE from NSCLC and poor pretreatment performance (median KPS of 40), the intrapleural administration of SSAg was efficacious in resolving the MPE without any clinically important adverse effects. SSAg-treated patients with a median KPS of 40 (range, 10 to 60) had a median survival that exceeded that with talc poudrage, and was comparable to current systemic chemotherapy used in patients with KPS >/= 70 status. SSAg treatment is simple to perform, minimally invasive, and does not require hospital time. It may be an attractive alternative to existing palliative modalities for stage IIIb patients with MPE and poor performance who are not candidates for systemic chemotherapy.

摘要

背景

恶性胸腔积液(MPE)在高达50%的非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)患者中可能出现。这些患者中的大多数身体状况较差,预后不佳,生存时间为2至3个月。由于这些患者通常因MPE出现症状,所以需要及时治疗。NSCLC伴MPE且身体状况评分较差(东部肿瘤协作组[ECOG]评分≥2,卡诺夫斯基体能状态[KPS]评分<50)的患者一般不进行全身化疗。治疗是姑息性的,包括胸腔内置管引流或用滑石粉、强力霉素或博来霉素进行化学性胸膜固定术。后几种方式均不能延长生存期。

目的

我们的目标是研究一种新型治疗药物金黄色葡萄球菌超抗原(SSAg)的毒性和治疗效果,SSAg是一种强大的T细胞刺激剂,对未经选择的、连续的NSCLC伴MPE(Ⅲb期伴胸腔积液)且身体状况较差的患者进行胸腔内给药。通过使SSAg直接进入支气管和纵隔淋巴管,我们预测胸腔内给予SSAg将使MPE消退,并延长该晚期NSCLC且预后有限人群的生存期。

方法

14例连续的、未经选择的NSCLC伴MPE患者,预处理时KPS评分中位数为40(范围10至60),接受胸腔内注入SSAg,100至400 pg,每周1次或2次(平均3.7±1.3次治疗[±标准差]),直至胸腔积液消退。对他们进行药物毒性、消退情况、MPE持续时间和生存期评估。

结果

除了轻度发热(最高2级)外,SSAg治疗的毒性轻微,明显没有呼吸窘迫或低血压。11例患者完全缓解(CR),3例患者MPE部分缓解。12例患者的缓解持续>90天,复发的中位时间为5个月(范围3至23个月)。SSAg治疗组的中位生存期为7.9个月(范围2至36个月;95%置信区间[CI],5.9至11.4个月),相比之下,18例连续的、未经选择的NSCLC(Ⅲb期)伴MPE患者接受滑石粉喷洒治疗的中位生存期为2.5个月(范围0.1至57个月;95%CI,1.3至3.4个月)(p = 0.044)。14例接受SSAg治疗的病例和13例滑石粉喷洒治疗的患者,预处理时KPS相当(范围10至60;中位数分别为40和30)且分布情况(p = 0.5),生存期分别为7.9个月(95%CI,5.9至11.4个月)和2.0个月(95%CI,0.4至2.9个月)(p = 0.0023)。14例接受SSAg治疗的患者中有9例存活>6个月,4例存活>9个月,3例存活>350天。CR组中的1例患者已存活36个月。13例接受滑石粉治疗的患者中无1例存活>6个月。

解读

在14例未经选择的、连续的NSCLC伴MPE且预处理时身体状况较差(KPS中位数为40)的患者中,胸腔内给予SSAg有效消退了MPE,且无任何具有临床重要意义的不良反应。预处理时KPS中位数为40(范围10至60)的SSAg治疗患者的中位生存期超过了滑石粉喷洒治疗,且与KPS≥70状态患者目前使用的全身化疗相当。SSAg治疗操作简单,微创,且无需住院时间。对于Ⅲb期伴MPE且身体状况较差、不适合进行全身化疗的患者,它可能是现有姑息治疗方式的一种有吸引力的替代方法。

相似文献

1
Intrapleural staphylococcal superantigen induces resolution of malignant pleural effusions and a survival benefit in non-small cell lung cancer.胸膜内注射葡萄球菌超抗原可促使恶性胸腔积液消退,并使非小细胞肺癌患者获得生存益处。
Chest. 2004 Nov;126(5):1529-39. doi: 10.1378/chest.126.5.1529.
2
Interventions for the management of malignant pleural effusions: a network meta-analysis.恶性胸腔积液管理的干预措施:一项网状Meta分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Apr 21;4(4):CD010529. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010529.pub3.
3
Prognostic impact of malignant pleural effusion at presentation in patients with metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer.初诊时恶性胸腔积液对转移性非小细胞肺癌患者预后的影响。
J Thorac Oncol. 2012 Oct;7(10):1485-9. doi: 10.1097/JTO.0b013e318267223a.
4
[Comparative study of video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery vs thoracic tube drainage in synthetic therapy for malignant pleural effusion secondary to non-small cell lung cancer].[电视胸腔镜手术与胸腔闭式引流术在非小细胞肺癌所致恶性胸腔积液综合治疗中的对比研究]
Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao. 2006 Jul;26(7):1023-6.
5
Talc pleurodesis as surgical palliation of patients with malignant pleural effusion. Analysis of factors affecting survival.滑石粉胸膜固定术作为恶性胸腔积液患者的姑息性手术。影响生存的因素分析。
Anticancer Res. 2012 Nov;32(11):5071-4.
6
Bevacizumab plus chemotherapy for advanced non-squamous non-small-cell lung cancer with malignant pleural effusion.贝伐珠单抗联合化疗治疗恶性胸腔积液的晚期非鳞状非小细胞肺癌。
Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2013 Feb;71(2):457-61. doi: 10.1007/s00280-012-2026-4. Epub 2012 Nov 21.
7
Talc poudrage versus talc slurry in the treatment of malignant pleural effusion. A prospective comparative study.滑石粉喷洒术与滑石粉浆治疗恶性胸腔积液的前瞻性对照研究。
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2006 Dec;30(6):827-32. doi: 10.1016/j.ejcts.2006.10.002.
8
Interventions for the management of malignant pleural effusions: a network meta-analysis.恶性胸腔积液管理的干预措施:一项网状荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 May 8;2016(5):CD010529. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010529.pub2.
9
Intrapleural paclitaxel for malignant pleural effusion from ovarian and breast cancer: a phase II study with pharmacokinetic analysis.紫杉醇胸腔内注射治疗卵巢癌和乳腺癌所致恶性胸腔积液:一项药代动力学分析的 II 期研究。
Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2012 Mar;69(3):781-7. doi: 10.1007/s00280-011-1765-y. Epub 2011 Oct 29.
10
Intrapleural administration of cisplatin and etoposide to treat malignant pleural effusions in patients with non-small cell lung cancer.顺铂和依托泊苷胸腔内给药治疗非小细胞肺癌患者恶性胸腔积液
Chemotherapy. 1999 May-Jun;45(3):197-204. doi: 10.1159/000007183.

引用本文的文献

1
Intrapleural Perfusion With Staphylococcal Enterotoxin C for Malignant Pleural Effusion: A Clustered Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.金黄色葡萄球菌肠毒素C胸腔内灌注治疗恶性胸腔积液:一项聚类系统评价和Meta分析
Front Med (Lausanne). 2022 Apr 25;9:816973. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2022.816973. eCollection 2022.
2
The Inflammatory Cytokine Profile of Patients with Malignant Pleural Effusion Treated with Pleurodesis.经胸膜固定术治疗的恶性胸腔积液患者的炎性细胞因子谱
J Clin Med. 2020 Dec 11;9(12):4010. doi: 10.3390/jcm9124010.
3
Endogenous HLA-DQ8αβ programs superantigens (SEG/SEI) to silence toxicity and unleash a tumoricidal network with long-term melanoma survival.
内源性 HLA-DQ8αβ 程序可将超抗原 (SEG/SEI) 沉默毒性,并释放具有长期黑色素瘤存活的杀瘤网络。
J Immunother Cancer. 2020 Oct;8(2). doi: 10.1136/jitc-2020-001493.
4
Chemical pleurodesis - a review of mechanisms involved in pleural space obliteration.化学性胸膜固定术——胸膜腔闭塞相关机制的综述。
Respir Res. 2019 Nov 7;20(1):247. doi: 10.1186/s12931-019-1204-x.
5
Making cold malignant pleural effusions hot: driving novel immunotherapies.让冰冷的恶性胸腔积液“热”起来:推动新型免疫疗法发展
Oncoimmunology. 2019 Jan 22;8(4):e1554969. doi: 10.1080/2162402X.2018.1554969. eCollection 2019.
6
Sickle cells produce functional immune modulators and cytotoxics.镰状细胞产生功能性免疫调节剂和细胞毒素。
Am J Hematol. 2017 Oct;92(10):981-988. doi: 10.1002/ajh.24836. Epub 2017 Aug 17.
7
Diagnosis and management options in malignant pleural effusions.恶性胸腔积液的诊断与处理方法
Lung India. 2017 Mar-Apr;34(2):160-166. doi: 10.4103/0970-2113.201305.
8
Malignant pleural effusion: from bench to bedside.恶性胸腔积液:从实验台到病床边
Eur Respir Rev. 2016 Jun;25(140):189-98. doi: 10.1183/16000617.0019-2016.
9
Staphylococcal Enterotoxin O Exhibits Cell Cycle Modulating Activity.葡萄球菌肠毒素O具有细胞周期调节活性。
Front Microbiol. 2016 Apr 15;7:441. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2016.00441. eCollection 2016.
10
Intrapleural cisplatin for management of malignant pleural effusion in a patient with plasma cell leucaemia.胸膜内注射顺铂治疗浆细胞白血病患者的恶性胸腔积液
BMJ Case Rep. 2015 Jun 29;2015:bcr2015210044. doi: 10.1136/bcr-2015-210044.