• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

淋巴结清扫的解剖范围:对临床局限性前列腺癌男性患者的影响。

Anatomical extent of lymph node dissection: impact on men with clinically localized prostate cancer.

作者信息

Allaf Mohamad E, Palapattu Ganesh S, Trock Bruce J, Carter H Ballentine, Walsh Patrick C

机构信息

Department of Urology, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, The James Buchanan Brady Urological Institute, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.

出版信息

J Urol. 2004 Nov;172(5 Pt 1):1840-4. doi: 10.1097/01.ju.0000140912.45821.1d.

DOI:10.1097/01.ju.0000140912.45821.1d
PMID:15540734
Abstract

PURPOSE

This study evaluates the influence of the anatomical extent of pelvic lymph node dissection performed at radical prostatectomy on lymph node yield, staging accuracy and time to prostate specific antigen progression.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Between February 1992 and April 2003, 2 surgeons at 1 hospital performed 2,135 and 1,865 radical prostatectomies with pelvic lymph node dissection, respectively. One surgeon routinely performed an extended lymph node dissection while the second surgeon performed a limited pelvic lymphadenectomy. The number of lymph nodes extracted and the number of patients with positive lymph nodes detected were analyzed and compared. Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to compare the biochemical recurrence-free survival between the 2 groups of patients with occult nodal disease.

RESULTS

Extended lymph node dissection removed more lymph nodes (mean 11.6 vs 8.9, p<0.0001) and detected more lymph node positive disease (3.2% vs 1.1%, p<0.0001) than the more anatomically limited technique. This finding held true for patients across all pathology groups. Among men with lymph node positive disease involving less than 15% of extracted nodes, the 5-year prostate specific antigen progression-free rate for extended lymph node dissection was 43% versus 10% for the more limited lymph node dissection (p = 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Compared to limited lymph node dissection, extended pelvic lymphadenectomy appears to identify men with positive lymph nodes more frequently. A significant benefit in biochemical recurrence-free survival may exist for certain subgroups undergoing the extended dissection. However, because the results may be influenced by stage migration, longer followup is necessary to determine whether the apparent therapeutic effect persists.

摘要

目的

本研究评估根治性前列腺切除术中盆腔淋巴结清扫的解剖范围对淋巴结获取量、分期准确性及前列腺特异性抗原进展时间的影响。

材料与方法

1992年2月至2003年4月期间,一家医院的2名外科医生分别实施了2135例和1865例伴有盆腔淋巴结清扫的根治性前列腺切除术。一名外科医生常规进行扩大淋巴结清扫,另一名外科医生进行有限的盆腔淋巴结切除术。分析并比较提取的淋巴结数量及检测出的淋巴结阳性患者数量。采用Kaplan-Meier分析比较两组隐匿性淋巴结疾病患者的无生化复发生存率。

结果

与解剖范围更有限的技术相比,扩大淋巴结清扫切除的淋巴结更多(平均11.6个对8.9个,p<0.0001),检测到的淋巴结阳性疾病更多(3.2%对1.1%,p<0.0001)。这一发现适用于所有病理组的患者。在淋巴结阳性疾病累及提取淋巴结不到15%的男性中,扩大淋巴结清扫的5年无前列腺特异性抗原进展率为43%,而更有限的淋巴结清扫为10%(p = 0.01)。

结论

与有限淋巴结清扫相比,扩大盆腔淋巴结切除术似乎更频繁地识别出淋巴结阳性男性。对于某些接受扩大清扫的亚组患者,在无生化复发生存方面可能存在显著益处。然而,由于结果可能受分期迁移影响,需要更长时间的随访来确定明显的治疗效果是否持续存在。

相似文献

1
Anatomical extent of lymph node dissection: impact on men with clinically localized prostate cancer.淋巴结清扫的解剖范围:对临床局限性前列腺癌男性患者的影响。
J Urol. 2004 Nov;172(5 Pt 1):1840-4. doi: 10.1097/01.ju.0000140912.45821.1d.
2
The extent of lymphadenectomy for pTXNO prostate cancer does not affect prostate cancer outcome in the prostate specific antigen era.在前列腺特异性抗原时代,pTXNO前列腺癌的淋巴结清扫范围不影响前列腺癌的预后。
J Urol. 2005 Apr;173(4):1121-5. doi: 10.1097/01.ju.0000155533.93528.4c.
3
Extended pelvic lymphadenectomy in patients undergoing radical prostatectomy: high incidence of lymph node metastasis.接受根治性前列腺切除术患者的扩大盆腔淋巴结清扫术:淋巴结转移发生率高。
J Urol. 2002 Apr;167(4):1681-6.
4
Standardized comparison of robot-assisted limited and extended pelvic lymphadenectomy for prostate cancer.机器人辅助局限性和广泛性前列腺癌盆腔淋巴结切除术的标准化比较。
BJU Int. 2013 Jul;112(1):81-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.11788.x. Epub 2013 Jan 25.
5
Nodal counts during pelvic lymph node dissection for prostate cancer: an objective indicator of quality under the influence of very subjective factors.前列腺癌盆腔淋巴结清扫术中的淋巴结计数:受非常主观因素影响的质量客观指标。
BJU Int. 2012 May;109(9):1323-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2011.10610.x. Epub 2011 Oct 12.
6
Salvage lymph node dissection for nodal recurrence of prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy.根治性前列腺切除术后前列腺癌淋巴结复发的挽救性淋巴结清扫术。
J Urol. 2015 Feb;193(2):484-90. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2014.08.096. Epub 2014 Aug 30.
7
Impact of surgical volume on the rate of lymph node metastases in patients undergoing radical prostatectomy and extended pelvic lymph node dissection for clinically localized prostate cancer.手术量对接受根治性前列腺切除术及扩大盆腔淋巴结清扫术的临床局限性前列腺癌患者淋巴结转移率的影响。
Eur Urol. 2008 Oct;54(4):794-802. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2008.05.018. Epub 2008 May 21.
8
Detecting lymph nodes metastasis in prostate cancer through extended vs. standard laparoscopic pelvic lymphadenectomy.通过扩大腹腔镜盆腔淋巴结清扫术与标准腹腔镜盆腔淋巴结清扫术检测前列腺癌中的淋巴结转移
Aktuelle Urol. 2010 Jan;41 Suppl 1:S10-4. doi: 10.1055/s-0029-1224663. Epub 2010 Jan 21.
9
Robotic extended pelvic lymphadenectomy for intermediate- and high-risk prostate cancer.机器人辅助扩大盆腔淋巴结清扫术治疗中高危前列腺癌。
Eur Urol. 2012 May;61(5):1004-10. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2012.01.048. Epub 2012 Feb 22.
10
Biochemical recurrence after robot-assisted extended pelvic lymphadenectomy for prostate cancer.机器人辅助扩大盆腔淋巴结清扫术后前列腺癌的生化复发
Can J Urol. 2018 Jun;25(3):9340-9348.

引用本文的文献

1
Benefit and harm of lymphadenectomy in intermediate risk prostate cancer: comparison of five nomograms.中危前列腺癌淋巴结清扫术的获益与危害:五种列线图比较。
BMC Urol. 2023 Nov 18;23(1):190. doi: 10.1186/s12894-023-01362-y.
2
Comparative analysis of GOLPH3 expression in lymph node-positive prostate cancer: immunohistochemistry staining patterns and clinical significance.淋巴结阳性前列腺癌中GOLPH3表达的比较分析:免疫组化染色模式及临床意义
Front Oncol. 2023 Sep 18;13:1265788. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1265788. eCollection 2023.
3
Role of IL-17A and IL-17RA in Prostate Cancer with Lymph Nodes Metastasis: Expression Patterns and Clinical Significance.
IL-17A和IL-17RA在伴淋巴结转移前列腺癌中的作用:表达模式及临床意义
Cancers (Basel). 2023 Sep 15;15(18):4578. doi: 10.3390/cancers15184578.
4
Extended versus standard pelvic lymph node dissection yields no difference in 3-year biochemical recurrence rates.扩大盆腔淋巴结清扫术与标准盆腔淋巴结清扫术相比,3年生化复发率无差异。
Prostate Int. 2023 Jun;11(2):107-112. doi: 10.1016/j.prnil.2022.12.005. Epub 2022 Dec 21.
5
The relationship between biochemical recurrence and number of lymph nodes removed during surgery for localized prostate cancer.局限性前列腺癌手术中切除的淋巴结数目与生化复发的关系。
BMC Urol. 2023 Apr 28;23(1):68. doi: 10.1186/s12894-023-01228-3.
6
Different lymph node dissection ranges during radical prostatectomy for patients with prostate cancer: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.不同淋巴结清扫范围在前列腺癌根治术中的应用:系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
World J Surg Oncol. 2023 Mar 6;21(1):80. doi: 10.1186/s12957-023-02932-y.
7
Comparison of neoadjuvant chemohormonal therapy vs. extended pelvic lymph-node dissection in high-risk prostate cancer treated with robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术治疗高危前列腺癌中新辅助化疗联合激素治疗与扩大盆腔淋巴结清扫术的比较。
Sci Rep. 2023 Mar 1;13(1):3436. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-30627-7.
8
Diagnostic Value of Radio-Guided Sentinel Node Detection in Patients with Prostate Cancer Undergoing Radical Prostatectomy with Modified-Extended Lymphadenectomy.放射性引导前哨淋巴结检测在接受改良扩大淋巴结清扫术的前列腺癌根治术患者中的诊断价值
Cancers (Basel). 2022 Oct 13;14(20):5012. doi: 10.3390/cancers14205012.
9
Significance of pelvic lymph node dissection during radical prostatectomy in high-risk prostate cancer patients receiving neoadjuvant chemohormonal therapy.新辅助化疗内分泌治疗的高危前列腺癌患者行根治性前列腺切除术中盆腔淋巴结清扫的意义。
Sci Rep. 2022 Jun 11;12(1):9675. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-13651-x.
10
Construction of a Diagnostic Model for Lymph Node Metastasis of the Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma Using Preoperative Ultrasound Features and Imaging Omics.利用术前超声特征和影像学组学构建甲状腺乳头状癌淋巴结转移的诊断模型。
J Healthc Eng. 2022 Feb 8;2022:1872412. doi: 10.1155/2022/1872412. eCollection 2022.