Mahoney Gerald, Wheeden C Abigail, Perales Frida
Mandel School of Applied Social Sciences, Case Western Reserve University, 10900 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, OH 44106-7164, USA.
Res Dev Disabil. 2004 Nov-Dec;25(6):539-58. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2004.04.001.
Developmental outcomes attained by children receiving preschool special education services in relationship to both the general instructional approach used by their teachers and their parents' style of interaction were examined. The sample included 70 children from 41 Early Childhood Special Education (ECSE) classrooms. The type of instructional model children received was determined by dividing the sample into three clusters based upon six global ratings of children's classroom environment: Choice; Cognitive Problem-Solving; Child-Initiated Learning; Developmental Match; Child-Centered Routines; and Rewards and Discipline Strategies. Based on this analysis, 27 children were classified as receiving developmental instruction; 15 didactic instruction; and 28 naturalistic instruction. Observations of parent-child interaction collected at the beginning and end of the year were classified along four dimensions using the Maternal Behavior Rating Scale: Responsiveness, Affect, Achievement Orientation and Directiveness. Results indicated that the kinds of experiences that children received varied significantly across the three instructional models. However, there were no significant differences in the impact of these instructional models on children's rate of development. Regression analyses indicated that children's rate of development at the end of intervention was significantly related to their parents' style of interaction but was unrelated to the type of instructional model they received.
研究了接受学前特殊教育服务的儿童所取得的发展成果,这些成果与教师采用的一般教学方法以及他们父母的互动方式有关。样本包括来自41个幼儿特殊教育(ECSE)班级的70名儿童。根据对儿童课堂环境的六项总体评分,将样本分为三类,从而确定儿童接受的教学模式类型:选择;认知问题解决;儿童主动学习;发展匹配;以儿童为中心的日常活动;奖励与纪律策略。基于这一分析,27名儿童被归类为接受发展性教学;15名接受说教式教学;28名接受自然主义教学。使用母亲行为评定量表,从四个维度对年初和年末收集的亲子互动观察结果进行分类:反应性、情感、成就取向和指导性。结果表明,儿童接受的体验类型在三种教学模式之间存在显著差异。然而,这些教学模式对儿童发展速度的影响没有显著差异。回归分析表明,干预结束时儿童的发展速度与他们父母的互动方式显著相关,但与他们接受的教学模式类型无关。