Maury Philippe, Sarre Alexandre, Terrand Jérôme, Rosa Antonio, Kucera Pavel, Kappenberger Lukas, Raddatz Eric
Division of Cardiology, University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Mol Cell Biochem. 2004 Oct;265(1-2):141-9. doi: 10.1023/b:mcbi.0000044391.97857.4d.
BACKGROUND/AIM: Excitation-contraction coupling is modulated by nitric oxide (NO) which otherwise has either beneficial or detrimental effects on myocardial function during hypoxia-reoxygenation. This work aimed at characterizing the variations of electromechanical delay (EMD) induced by anoxia-reoxygenation within the developing heart and determining whether atrial and ventricular EMD are modulated by NO to the same extent.
Hearts of 4 or 4.5-day-old chick embryos were excised and submitted in vitro to normoxia (45 min), anoxia (30 min) and reoxygenation (60 min). Electrocardiogram and atrial and ventricular contractions were simultaneously recorded throughout experiment. Anoxia-reoxygenation-induced chrono-, dromo-and inotropic disturbances and changes in EMD in atrium (EMDa) and ventricle (EMDv) were investigated in control hearts and in hearts exposed to 0.1, 1, 10, 50 and 100 microM of DETA-NONOate (a NO donating agent) or to 50 microM of L-NAME (a NOS inhibitor).
Under normoxia, heart rate, PR interval, ventricular shortening velocity, EMDa and EMDv were similar in control, L-NAME-treated and DETA-NONOate-treated hearts. Under anoxia, cardiac activity became markedly erratic within less than 10 min in all groups. At the onset of reoxygenation, EMDv was increased by about 300% with respect to the preanoxic value while EMDa did not vary significatively. Compared to control conditions, L-NAME or DETA-NONOate had no influence on the negative chrono-, dromo- and inotropic effects induced by anoxia-reoxygenation. However, L-NAME prolonged EMDv during anoxia and delayed EMDv recovery during reoxygenation while 100 microM DETA-NONOate had the opposite effects. EMDa was neither affected by NOS inhibitor nor NO donor. At the end of reoxygenation, all the investigated parameters returned to their basal values.
This work provides evidence that a NO-dependent pathway is involved in regulation of the ventricular excitation-contraction coupling in the anoxic-reoxygenated developing heart.
背景/目的:兴奋-收缩偶联受一氧化氮(NO)调节,而在缺氧-复氧过程中,NO对心肌功能既有有益作用,也有有害作用。本研究旨在描述发育中心脏缺氧-复氧诱导的机电延迟(EMD)变化,并确定心房和心室EMD是否受NO同等程度的调节。
切除4或4.5日龄鸡胚心脏,体外分别进行常氧(45分钟)、缺氧(30分钟)和复氧(60分钟)处理。在整个实验过程中同步记录心电图以及心房和心室收缩情况。在对照心脏以及暴露于0.1、1、10、50和100微摩尔DETA- NONOate(一种NO供体)或50微摩尔L-NAME(一种NOS抑制剂)的心脏中,研究缺氧-复氧诱导的变时、变传导和变力紊乱以及心房(EMDa)和心室(EMDv)中EMD的变化。
在常氧条件下,对照、L-NAME处理和DETA- NONOate处理的心脏中心率、PR间期、心室缩短速度、EMDa和EMDv相似。在缺氧条件下,所有组的心脏活动在不到10分钟内明显变得不稳定。在复氧开始时,EMDv相对于缺氧前值增加了约300%,而EMDa没有显著变化。与对照条件相比,L-NAME或DETA- NONOate对缺氧-复氧诱导的负性变时、变传导和变力作用没有影响。然而,L-NAME在缺氧期间延长了EMDv,并在复氧期间延迟了EMDv的恢复,而100微摩尔DETA- NONOate则有相反的作用。EMDa既不受NOS抑制剂影响,也不受NO供体影响。在复氧结束时,所有研究参数均恢复到基础值。
本研究提供了证据,表明一条依赖NO的途径参与了缺氧-复氧发育中心脏心室兴奋-收缩偶联的调节。