Mauron Alexandre, Baertschi Bernard
Bioethics Research and Teaching Unit, Faculty of Medicine, University of Geneva, Centre médical Universitaire, CH-1211 Genève 4, Switzerland.
J Med Philos. 2004 Oct;29(5):563-81. doi: 10.1080/03605310490514234.
As elsewhere, the ethical debate on embryonic stem cell research in Central Europe, especially Germany and Switzerland, involves controversy over the status of the human embryo. There is a distinctive Kantian flavor to the standard arguments however, and we show how they often embody a set of misunderstandings and argumentative shortcuts we term"embryological Kantianism."We also undertake a broader analysis of three arguments typically presented in this debate, especially in official position papers, namely the identity, continuity, and potentiality arguments. It turns out that these arguments do not support the strong, quasi-personal status accorded to the embryos in these official opinions.
