Tang B, Hanna G B, Joice P, Cuschieri A
Surgical Skills Unit, Ninewells Hospital and Medical School, University of Dundee, Dundee, Scotland.
Arch Surg. 2004 Nov;139(11):1215-20. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.139.11.1215.
Surgical operative performance benefits from analysis of the mechanisms underlying technical errors committed during surgery.
Prospective study using the Observational Clinical Human Reliability Assessment (OCHRA) system and complete unedited videotapes of the operations.
Three National Health Service hospitals within the United Kingdom.
Two hundred consecutive patients with symptomatic gallstone disease.
Elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy for symptomatic gallstone disease by surgeons, who were blind to the nature and objectives of the study, using their usual operative technique.
Surgical consequential and inconsequential operative errors.
The analysis of 38 062 steps of the 200 laparoscopic cholecystectomies performed by 26 surgeons identified 2242 errors. The mean +/- SD total, inconsequential, and consequential errors per surgical procedure were 11.0 +/- 8.0, 8.0 +/- 6.0, and 4.0 +/- 3.0, respectively. Dissection of the Calot triangle (second task zone of the operation) incurred more total errors (6.5 +/- 5.4) compared with the first (2.9 +/- 2.8, P<.001) and third (5.1 +/- 3.9, P<.05) task zones. This translated to a higher error probability (6.9% vs 3.5% for the first and 5.5% for third task zones). The combined sharp and blunt dissection method had fewer errors than the blunt/teasing dissection technique (9.45 +/- 7.6 vs 13.9 +/- 7.3, P<.001) although different surgeons were involved. The most serious consequences were encountered during dissection with the electrosurgical hook knife.
This study has confirmed that the Observational Clinical Human Reliability Assessment system provides a comprehensive objective assessment of the quality of surgical operative performance by documenting the errors, the stage of the operation in which errors are enacted most frequently, and where these errors have serious consequences (hazard zones).
通过分析手术中技术失误背后的机制,手术操作表现会得到改善。
采用观察性临床人体可靠性评估(OCHRA)系统和完整未编辑的手术录像带进行前瞻性研究。
英国的三家国民保健服务医院。
200例连续性有症状胆结石疾病患者。
由对研究性质和目的不知情的外科医生,采用其常规手术技术,对有症状胆结石疾病进行择期腹腔镜胆囊切除术。
手术相关和无关的操作失误。
对26名外科医生实施的200例腹腔镜胆囊切除术的38062个步骤进行分析,发现2242处失误。每例手术的平均±标准差的总失误、无关失误和相关失误分别为11.0±8.0、8.0±6.0和4.0±3.0。与第一(2.9±2.8,P<0.001)和第三(5.1±3.9,P<0.05)任务区域相比,胆囊三角区(手术的第二个任务区域)的总失误更多(6.5±5.4)。这转化为更高的失误概率(第一个任务区域为3.5%,第三个任务区域为5.5%,而此处为6.9%)。尽管涉及不同的外科医生,但锐性与钝性联合解剖方法的失误比钝性/挑剥解剖技术少(9.45±7.6比13.9±7.3,P<0.001)。使用电外科钩刀进行解剖时出现的后果最为严重。
本研究证实,观察性临床人体可靠性评估系统通过记录失误、失误最常发生的手术阶段以及这些失误产生严重后果的部位(危险区域),对外科手术操作质量提供了全面客观的评估。