Machado P, Michalaki H, Roche P, Gaucherand M, Thivolet J, Nicolas J F
Dermatology Clinic, Hôpital E. Herriot, Lyon, France.
Br J Dermatol. 1992 Mar;126(3):236-41. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2133.1992.tb00651.x.
Specialized immunological assays are required for the accurate diagnosis of bullous dermatoses such as bullous pemphigoid (BP), epidermolysis bullosa acquisita and bullous lupus erythematosus. The aim of this study was to analyse and compare the sensitivity of indirect immunofluorescence (IF) on salt-split skin and immunoblotting for the detection of circulating autoantibodies in BP. Of the BP patients selected for the study, 74/79 (94%) had circulating autoantibodies detected by at least one of the two methods. Both methods had comparable sensitivity and detected BP-specific autoantibodies in 82-85% of the patients. Because 20% of the patients were found to be positive by only one of the methods, both methods should be used in the diagnosis of BP. Indirect IF on salt-split skin is easier to perform and is preferable in routine analysis, but Western blotting may be used as a complementary assay with sera showing no reactivity on salt-split skin.
准确诊断大疱性皮肤病(如大疱性类天疱疮(BP)、获得性大疱性表皮松解症和大疱性红斑狼疮)需要专门的免疫检测方法。本研究的目的是分析和比较盐裂皮肤间接免疫荧光(IF)和免疫印迹法检测BP循环自身抗体的敏感性。在入选本研究的BP患者中,74/79(94%)通过两种方法中的至少一种检测到循环自身抗体。两种方法的敏感性相当,在82-85%的患者中检测到BP特异性自身抗体。由于20%的患者仅通过其中一种方法检测为阳性,因此在BP的诊断中应同时使用两种方法。盐裂皮肤间接免疫荧光操作更容易,在常规分析中更可取,但蛋白质印迹法可作为盐裂皮肤无反应血清的补充检测方法。