[没有社会学的社会精神病学。对一本科学期刊的分析]
[Social psychiatry without sociology. Analysis of a scientific journal].
作者信息
Angermeyer Matthias C, Kluge Hendrik, Riedel-Heller Steffi G, Roick Christiane
机构信息
Klinik und Poliklinik für Psychiatrie, Universität Leipzig.
出版信息
Psychiatr Prax. 2004 Nov;31(8):420-4. doi: 10.1055/s-2004-828506.
AIM
Psychiatry and Sociology have followed separate avenues in Germany since the mid 1970 s. The aim of this work is to investigate their present relationship by means of an analysis of a scientific journal.
METHOD
All original works dealing with social psychiatric subjects and appearing in Psychiatrische Praxis in the years 2002 and 2003 were analysed.
RESULTS
Sociologists appear to be a minority among the authors. Questions that are explicitly related to sociological theories were an exception, and sociological authors have hardly been quoted.
CONCLUSION
Social psychiatric research in Germany is still conducted without Sociology. If social psychiatry is to gain in importance as a scientific discipline, closer cooperation with its mother discipline is imperative. As an example, the application of the rational choice theory in psychiatric research is discussed.
目的
自20世纪70年代中期以来，精神病学和社会学在德国沿着不同的道路发展。这项工作的目的是通过对一份科学期刊的分析来研究它们目前的关系。
方法
对2002年和2003年发表在《精神病学实践》上的所有涉及社会精神病学主题的原创作品进行分析。
结果
社会学家在作者中似乎占少数。与社会学理论明确相关的问题是个例外，社会学作者几乎未被引用。
结论
德国的社会精神病学研究仍在没有社会学参与的情况下进行。如果社会精神病学要作为一门科学学科变得更加重要，与它的母学科更紧密的合作势在必行。作为一个例子，讨论了理性选择理论在精神病学研究中的应用。
Zotero 插件