Suppr超能文献

获得腹腔镜手术技能熟练度:方向重要吗?

Acquiring laparoscopic skill proficiency: does orientation matter?

作者信息

Moschos Elysia, Coleman Robert L

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Tex, USA.

出版信息

Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004 Nov;191(5):1782-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2004.07.073.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

This study was undertaken to determine whether side-on laparoscopic operating orientation alters time-to-skill mastery compared with head-on orientation.

STUDY DESIGN

One hundred thirty-one medical students were randomly assigned by operating axis (camera position to operating field) and completed 10 attempts at each of 5 previously validated laparoscopic skills stations. Time-to-completion was recorded for each attempt, generating an orientation and skill station learning curve. Statistical analysis was performed by using repeated measures analysis of variance and linear, polynomial, and logarithmic models with 95% CIs.

RESULTS

Sixty-eight students were randomly assigned to head-on orientation and 63 to side-on orientation. Comparing median time-to-completion by station, head-on attempts were faster than side-on attempts for every station. Comparing learning curves by orientation, side-on learning curves were steeper than head-on learning curves for every station, except one. Asymptotes were reached in both strata by the tenth attempt.

CONCLUSION

Greater initial disorientation is seen with side-on orientation compared with head-on orientation. This can be overcome with practice.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在确定与正面操作方向相比,侧面腹腔镜手术操作方向是否会改变技能掌握时间。

研究设计

131名医科学生按操作轴(摄像头位置与手术区域的关系)随机分组,并在5个先前经验证的腹腔镜技能训练站各完成10次尝试。记录每次尝试的完成时间,生成操作方向和技能训练站的学习曲线。采用重复测量方差分析以及95%置信区间的线性、多项式和对数模型进行统计分析。

结果

68名学生被随机分配到正面操作方向组,63名学生被分配到侧面操作方向组。按训练站比较完成时间中位数,正面操作的每次尝试都比侧面操作的更快。按操作方向比较学习曲线,除一个训练站外,每个训练站的侧面学习曲线都比正面学习曲线更陡。到第十次尝试时,两个组均达到渐近线。

结论

与正面操作方向相比,侧面操作方向最初会导致更大的方向迷失。这可以通过练习克服。

相似文献

1
Acquiring laparoscopic skill proficiency: does orientation matter?
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004 Nov;191(5):1782-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2004.07.073.
2
Objective assessment of training surgical skills using simulated tissue interface with real-time feedback.
J Surg Educ. 2008 Jul-Aug;65(4):270-4. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2008.05.012.
5
Correlating virtual reality and box trainer tasks in the assessment of laparoscopic surgical skills.
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2007 Nov;197(5):546.e1-4. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2007.07.026.
6
LapMentor metrics possess limited construct validity.
Simul Healthc. 2008 Spring;3(1):16-25. doi: 10.1097/SIH.0b013e31816366b9.
7
What is the learning curve for robotic assisted gynecologic surgery?
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2008 Sep-Oct;15(5):589-94. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2008.06.015.
9
Enhancing laparoscopic performance with the LTS3E: a computerized hybrid physical reality simulator.
Fertil Steril. 2008 Nov;90(5):1988-94. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2007.08.077. Epub 2008 May 27.
10
The value of virtual reality-simulator training in the development of laparoscopic surgical skills.
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2006 Mar-Apr;13(2):126-33. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2005.11.015.

引用本文的文献

1
Optimizing laparoscopic task efficiency: the role of camera and monitor positions.
Surg Endosc. 2007 Jun;21(6):980-4. doi: 10.1007/s00464-007-9360-3. Epub 2007 Apr 12.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验