Krunwiede Norma K, Meiers Sonja J, Eggenberger Sandra, Murray Shirley, Bliesmer Mary, Earle Patricia, Andros Dave, Harman Glenn, Rydholm Karl
School of Nursing, Minnesota State University, Mankato, MN, USA.
Oncol Nurs Forum. 2004 Nov 16;31(6):1145-2. doi: 10.1188/04.ONF.1145-1152.
PURPOSE/OBJECTIVES: To explore how rural families understand and manage the chemotherapy-induced neutropenia (CIN) experience.
Qualitative, inductive approach using family interviews.
Family homes in a rural community in the midwestern United States.
A convenience sample (7 families [21 people] who had a family member experiencing CIN) recruited from a regional cancer treatment center.
Semistructured family interviews that were recorded on audiotape occurred along with constant, comparative analysis over 12 months. An interdisciplinary research team analyzed the transcribed data using grounded theory methodology.
The family experience of CIN.
An overall family process of turbulent waiting with intensified connections was revealed. Families in the study experienced a sense of vulnerability in response to the diagnosis of CIN. Intensified connections existed within and beyond the families to nurses, physicians, and community members, emphasizing the value of relationships for rural families and highlighting trust in their care providers. Waiting for chemotherapy to resume created a sense of turbulence, an unsettling time described by families as "being on a roller coaster" or "dangling." To manage the period of waiting and protect the neutropenic patient, families developed family caring strategies, including inquiry, vigilance, and balancing. The process of turbulent waiting with intensified connections led families to a reframed family integrity that included an expanded capacity for caring and protecting.
Rural families understand and manage CIN in a context of vulnerability. The threat posed by cancer is heightened by CIN. Family waiting is a rich, interactive process by which families reemphasize relationships to manage neutropenia and is a process that healthcare professionals should acknowledge.
Findings suggest the need for further investigation of family caring strategies and for the development of family-level assessment measures in the instance of CIN. Findings contribute to theory development regarding family cancer care and suggest a need to develop an intervention protocol constructed from the perspective of a family-professional partnership.
目的/目标:探讨农村家庭如何理解和应对化疗引起的中性粒细胞减少症(CIN)经历。
采用家庭访谈的定性归纳法。
美国中西部一个农村社区的家庭住所。
从一个地区癌症治疗中心招募的便利样本(7个家庭[21人],家庭成员患有CIN)。
进行半结构化家庭访谈并录音,同时在12个月内进行持续的比较分析。一个跨学科研究团队使用扎根理论方法分析转录数据。
CIN的家庭经历。
揭示了一个充满动荡等待且联系加强的总体家庭过程。研究中的家庭在面对CIN诊断时感到脆弱。家庭内部以及与护士、医生和社区成员之间的联系得到加强,强调了关系对农村家庭的价值,并突出了他们对医疗服务提供者的信任。等待化疗恢复产生了一种动荡感,家庭将这段不安的时期描述为“坐过山车”或“悬而未决”。为了应对等待期并保护中性粒细胞减少的患者,家庭制定了家庭护理策略,包括询问、警惕和平衡。充满动荡等待且联系加强的过程使家庭形成了重新构建的家庭完整性,其中包括增强的关爱和保护能力。
农村家庭在脆弱的背景下理解和应对CIN。CIN加剧了癌症带来的威胁。家庭等待是一个丰富的互动过程,通过这个过程家庭重新强调关系以应对中性粒细胞减少症,这是医疗保健专业人员应该认识到的过程。
研究结果表明需要进一步调查家庭护理策略,并在CIN情况下制定家庭层面评估措施。研究结果有助于家庭癌症护理理论的发展,并表明需要从家庭 - 专业伙伴关系的角度制定干预方案。