Iwasaki Koji, Ito Yukako, Shibata Nobuhito, Takada Kanji, Sakurai Yuichi, Takagi Naoshi, Irie Shin, Nakamura Koichi
Department of Pharmacokinetics, Kyoto Pharmaceutical University, 5-Misasagi-Nakauchicho, Yamashina-ku, Kyoto, Japan.
Drug Metab Pharmacokinet. 2004 Oct;19(5):390-5. doi: 10.2133/dmpk.19.390.
Lansoprazole fast disintegrating tablet (LFDT) has been developed as a multiple unit formulation to increase the QOL of patients, i.e., easy intake without water. However, there is a possibility that patients intake LFDT in accordance with clarithromycin and amoxicillin with water. To study the effect of water on the absorption of lansoprazole (LPZ), the study was carried out using human volunteers. After selected by phenotype of LPZ metabolism, extensive metabolizers (EMs) of LPZ were used in this study. Twelve healthy male EMs intook LFDT containing 30 mg LPZ with 150 mL of water and without-water, i.e., with saliva, to study the pharmacokinetics of LPZ from the gastrointestinal tract by a cross-over manner with one-week washout period under fasted condition in the morning. The mean AUC(0-24s) were 2004.4+/-973.6 ng.h/mL in without-water experiment and 2018.5+/-1159.6 ng.h/mL in the case of with-water experiment. Mean C(maxs) were 851.9+/-450.8 ng/mL in without-water experiment and 830.8+/-456.8 ng/mL in with-water experiment, respectively. ANOVA was applied to the log-transformed AUC(0-24) and C(max) values. The 90% two sided confidence intervals for log-transformed AUC(0-24) was 0.78-1.22 and that for log-transformed C(max) was 0.67-1.37, respectively. By comparing these pharmacokinetic parameters, we may state that there was no significant difference between the two administration modes.
兰索拉唑速崩片(LFDT)已被开发为一种多单元制剂,以提高患者的生活质量,即无需用水即可轻松服用。然而,患者有可能将LFDT与克拉霉素和阿莫西林一起用水服用。为了研究水对兰索拉唑(LPZ)吸收的影响,该研究使用了人类志愿者。通过LPZ代谢表型选择后,本研究使用了LPZ的广泛代谢者(EMs)。12名健康男性EMs在禁食条件下于早晨采用交叉方式,在一周的洗脱期后,分别用水150 mL和不加水(即仅用唾液)服用含30 mg LPZ的LFDT,以研究LPZ从胃肠道的药代动力学。无水实验中平均AUC(0 - 24s)为2004.4±973.6 ng·h/mL,有水实验中为2018.5±1159.6 ng·h/mL。无水实验和有水实验的平均C(maxs)分别为851.9±450.8 ng/mL和830.8±456.8 ng/mL。对对数转换后的AUC(0 - 24)和C(max)值应用方差分析。对数转换后的AUC(0 - 24)的90%双侧置信区间为0.78 - 1.22,对数转换后的C(max)的90%双侧置信区间为0.67 - 1.37。通过比较这些药代动力学参数,我们可以得出两种给药方式之间没有显著差异的结论。