Suppr超能文献

依维莫司与低暴露量环孢素用于初治肾移植受者:一项为期三年的II期随机多中心开放标签研究

Everolimus and reduced-exposure cyclosporine in de novo renal-transplant recipients: a three-year phase II, randomized, multicenter, open-label study.

作者信息

Nashan Björn, Curtis John, Ponticelli Claudio, Mourad Georges, Jaffe Jonathan, Haas Tomas

机构信息

Kliniken der med. Hochschule, Zentrum Chirurgie, Hannover, Germany.

出版信息

Transplantation. 2004 Nov 15;78(9):1332-40. doi: 10.1097/01.tp.0000140486.97461.49.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Everolimus and cyclosporine (CsA) exhibit synergistic immunosuppressive activity when used in combination. We explored the use of everolimus with a CsA-sparing strategy in de novo renal-transplant recipients.

METHODS

A phase II, randomized, open-label 3-year study was performed in 111 patients to compare the efficacy and tolerability of everolimus (3 mg/day) in combination with basiliximab, steroids, and either full-dose Neoral (FDN) or reduced-dose Neoral (RDN) (CsA trough levels 125-250 ng/mL and 50-100 ng/mL, respectively). Efficacy failure (biopsy-proven acute rejection, death, graft loss, or loss to follow-up), safety, and renal function were evaluated at 6, 12, and 36 months. A protocol amendment allowed further reduction of CsA exposure after 12 months.

RESULTS

Efficacy failure was significantly higher in FDN than in the RDN group at 6 (15.1% vs. 3.4%; P=0.046), 12 (28.3% vs. 8.6%; P=0.012), and 36 (35.8% vs. 17.2%; P=0.032) months. Mean creatinine clearance was higher in the RDN group at 6 (59.7 mL/min vs. 51.1 mL/min; P=0.009), 12 (60.9 mL/min vs. 53.5 mL/min; P=0.007), and 36 (56.6 mL/min vs. 51.7 mL/min; P=0.436) months. Discontinuations and serious adverse events were more frequent in the FDN group. Reduction of CsA exposure for 6 months during the amendment improved renal function in the FDN group.

CONCLUSIONS

In de novo renal-transplant recipients, the regimen of everolimus plus RDN was well tolerated, with low efficacy failure and better renal function in comparison with everolimus plus FDN.

摘要

背景

依维莫司与环孢素(CsA)联合使用时具有协同免疫抑制活性。我们探讨了在初发肾移植受者中采用依维莫司并减少CsA用量的策略。

方法

对111例患者进行了一项为期3年的II期随机开放标签研究,比较依维莫司(3毫克/天)联合巴利昔单抗、类固醇以及全剂量新山地明(FDN)或减量新山地明(RDN)(CsA谷浓度分别为125 - 250纳克/毫升和50 - 100纳克/毫升)的疗效和耐受性。在6个月、12个月和36个月时评估疗效失败(活检证实的急性排斥反应、死亡、移植肾丢失或失访)、安全性和肾功能。一项方案修订允许在12个月后进一步减少CsA暴露量。

结果

在6个月(15.1%对3.4%;P = 0.046)、12个月(28.3%对8.6%;P = 0.012)和36个月(35.8%对17.2%;P = 0.032)时,FDN组的疗效失败率显著高于RDN组。RDN组在6个月(59.7毫升/分钟对51.1毫升/分钟;P = 0.009)、12个月(60.9毫升/分钟对53.5毫升/分钟;P = 0.007)和36个月(56.6毫升/分钟对51.7毫升/分钟;P = 0.436)时的平均肌酐清除率更高。FDN组的停药和严重不良事件更为频繁。在方案修订期间减少CsA暴露6个月可改善FDN组的肾功能。

结论

在初发肾移植受者中,依维莫司加RDN方案耐受性良好,与依维莫司加FDN相比,疗效失败率低且肾功能更好。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验