Pharmacology & Transplantation, INSERM U1248, Université de Limoges, Limoges, France.
Department of Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmacovigilance, CHU de Limoges, Limoges, France.
CPT Pharmacometrics Syst Pharmacol. 2022 Aug;11(8):1018-1028. doi: 10.1002/psp4.12810. Epub 2022 May 22.
Everolimus is an immunosuppressant with a small therapeutic index and large between-patient variability. The area under the concentration versus time curve (AUC) is the best marker of exposure but measuring it requires collecting many blood samples. The objective of this study was to train machine learning (ML) algorithms using pharmacokinetic (PK) profiles from kidney transplant recipients, simulated profiles, or both types, and compare their performance for everolimus AUC estimation using a limited number of predictors, as compared to an independent set of full PK profiles from patients, as well as to the corresponding maximum a posteriori Bayesian estimates (MAP-BE). XGBoost was first trained on 508 patient interdose AUCs estimated using MAP-BE, and then on 500-10,000 rich interdose PK profiles simulated using previously published population PK parameters. The predictors used were: predose, ~1 h, and ~2 h whole blood concentrations, differences between these concentrations, relative deviations from theoretical sampling times, morning dose, patient age, and time elapsed since transplantation. The best results were obtained with XGBoost trained on 5016 simulated profiles. AUC estimation achieved in an external dataset of 114 full-PK profiles was excellent (root mean squared error [RMSE] = 10.8 μgh/L) and slightly better than MAP-BE (RMSE = 11.9 μgh/L). Using more profiles (n = 10,035) did not improve the ML algorithm performance. The contribution of mixing patient and simulated profiles was significant only when they were in balanced numbers, with ~500 for each (RMSE = 12.5 μgh/L), compared with patient data alone (RMSE = 18.0 μgh/L).
依维莫司是一种免疫抑制剂,治疗指数小,患者间变异性大。浓度-时间曲线下面积(AUC)是暴露的最佳标志物,但测量需要采集大量血样。本研究的目的是使用肾移植受者的药代动力学(PK)谱、模拟谱或这两种类型的 PK 谱训练机器学习(ML)算法,并比较它们在使用有限数量的预测因子进行依维莫司 AUC 估计方面的性能,与来自患者的独立的全 PK 谱以及相应的最大后验贝叶斯估计(MAP-BE)相比。首先,使用 MAP-BE 估算的 508 个患者剂量间 AUC 对 XGBoost 进行训练,然后使用之前发表的群体 PK 参数模拟 500-10000 个丰富的剂量间 PK 谱。使用的预测因子为:给药前、约 1 小时和约 2 小时的全血浓度、这些浓度之间的差异、与理论采样时间的相对偏差、早晨剂量、患者年龄和移植后时间。使用在 5016 个模拟谱上训练的 XGBoost 获得了最佳结果。在 114 个全 PK 谱的外部数据集的 AUC 估计中,结果非常出色(均方根误差 [RMSE] = 10.8 μgh/L),略优于 MAP-BE(RMSE = 11.9 μgh/L)。使用更多的谱(n = 10035)并没有改善 ML 算法的性能。只有当患者和模拟谱的数量平衡时,混合患者和模拟谱的贡献才有意义,每个谱有大约 500 个(RMSE = 12.5 μgh/L),而仅使用患者数据时(RMSE = 18.0 μgh/L)。