Making sense of rising caesarean section rates: caesarean section on demand is obstetric dilemma.
作者信息
Jain Venu
出版信息
BMJ. 2004 Nov 20;329(7476):1240. doi: 10.1136/bmj.329.7476.1240-a.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Making sense of rising caesarean section rates: caesarean section on demand is obstetric dilemma.解读剖宫产率上升：按需剖宫产是产科难题。
BMJ. 2004 Nov 20;329(7476):1240. doi: 10.1136/bmj.329.7476.1240-a.
2
Behind the myth--few women prefer caesarean section in the absence of medical or obstetrical factors.背后的真相——在不存在医学或产科因素的情况下，很少有女性选择剖宫产。
Midwifery. 2011 Oct;27(5):620-7. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2010.05.005. Epub 2010 Jul 13.
3
Elective caesarean section as a transformative technological process: players, power and context.
J Adv Nurs. 2009 Aug;65(8):1762-71. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2009.05021.x. Epub 2009 Jun 1.
4
Achieving normality: the key to status passage to motherhood after a caesarean section.实现正常化：剖宫产后通向母亲身份的关键。
Midwifery. 2009 Oct;25(5):554-63. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2007.10.002. Epub 2008 Jan 10.
5
Absence of conception after caesarean section: voluntary or involuntary?剖宫产术后未受孕：是自愿还是非自愿？
BJOG. 2006 Mar;113(3):268-75. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2006.00853.x.
6
C-sections on demand.
Birth Gaz. 1994 Winter;11(1):4.
7
Ethics of caesarean section in the USA.美国剖宫产的伦理学问题。
Midwifery. 2004 Mar;20(1):118.
8
Birth preferences that deviate from the norm in Sweden: planned home birth versus planned cesarean section.在瑞典，偏离常规的生育偏好：计划在家分娩与计划剖宫产。
Birth. 2010 Dec;37(4):288-95. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-536X.2010.00423.x.
9
Problematizing choice in the elective cesarean debate.
Midwifery Today Int Midwife. 2005 Spring(73):20-2.
10
Cesarean sections: women's choice for giving birth?剖宫产：女性的分娩选择？
Birth. 1997 Jun;24(2):124-5.
本文引用的文献
1
Making sense of rising caesarean section rates.解读不断上升的剖宫产率。
BMJ. 2004 Sep 25;329(7468):696-7. doi: 10.1136/bmj.329.7468.696.
Zotero 插件