Suppr超能文献

Intertrochanteric versus subcapital osteotomy in slipped capital femoral epiphysis.

作者信息

Diab Mohammad, Hresko M Timothy, Millis Michael B

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, CA 94143, USA.

出版信息

Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004 Oct(427):204-12. doi: 10.1097/01.blo.0000139252.09270.25.

Abstract

We reviewed 15 flexion intertrochanteric osteotomies and 11 subcapital osteotomies done for chronic, severe, stable slipped capital femoral epiphysis at one institution with a minimum 2 years followup. The goal was to determine which procedure achieved better deformity correction and which procedure was safer. Radiographically, the two groups were equivalent in compensating for epiphyseal slip. Flexion intertrochanteric osteotomy was more effective in restoring proximal femoral anatomy, as determined by articulotrochanteric distance and trochanter-center of head distance. The incidence of complications, including osteonecrosis and chondrolysis, was low for both groups, but the reoperation rate was greater in the subcapital osteotomy group than in the flexion intertrochanteric group. Flexion intertrochanteric osteotomy seems to be an effective, safe, and reproducible realignment osteotomy for treatment of chronic, severe, stable slipped capital femoral epiphysis.

摘要

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验