Chomiak J, Ošťádal M, Dungl P
Ortopedická klinika 1. lékařské fakulty Univerzity Karlovy, Institutu postgraduálního vzdělávání ve zdravotnictví a Nemocnice Na Bulovce, Praha.
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech. 2019;86(1):23-32.
PURPOSE OF THE STUDY To evaluate the results of treatment of acute and chronic severe slips of slipped capital femoral epiphysis. The tested hypothesis was that the results will be comparable with the methods using surgical hip dislocation. MATERIAL AND METHODS In the period 1996-2014, 26 patients were treated for severe slips ( >60°). Boys prevailed (2:1) and were older on average (the mean age 13.8 vs.12 years). Chronic stable slips prevailed (16 patients) and were followed by acute-on-chronic slips (7 patients) and with acute slips (3 patients). The acute unstable slips were treated using closed reduction and transphyseal fixation. The acute-on-chronic slips were treated using closed reduction and fixation (2 patients) and subcapital osteotomy (5 patients), respectively. Chronic slips were treated as follows: with subcapital osteotomy (10 patients); with intertrochanteric femoral osteotomy (5 patients); and with transphyseal fixation without correction (1 patient). 22 patients were treated concurrently on the contralateral side as a prevention or to treat the slips. The follow-up ranged from 20 months to 13 years. The clinical results were evaluated according to four scores: 1) our own score (NB score) based on the reduction of ROM, shortening of extremity and limitations in activities; 2) Merle d'Aubigne score; 3) Harris hip score (HHS); 4) non arthritic hip score (NAHS). In the radiological evaluation, correction of slip angle, alpha-angle, avascular necrosis (AVN) and grade of arthrosis according to Toennis were observed. RESULTS According to the NB score 10 excellent results (38%), 11 very good results (42%), one good and one satisfactory result (4%) and 3 unsatisfactory results (11%) were achieved. According to the other scores the following results were reported: a) excellent: D'Aubigne-Postel - 19 (73%); HHS - 20 (77%); NAHS - 21(81%), b) good: D'Aubigne and HHS- 3 (11%); NAHS - 2 (8%), c) satisfactory: D 'Aubigne - one (4%), HHS and NAHS 0, d) unsatisfactory: D'Aubigne, HHS and NAHS - 3 (11%). The evaluation of surgical methods shows that the best results were achieved by closed reduction of acute slips (with 80% excellent results). The result of transphyseal fixation without reduction was satisfactory only. The intertrochanteric osteotomy led mostly to very good results (80%) and then to the excellent results (20%). After subcapital osteotomy, mostly excellent and very good results (40% each) were reported, followed by two unsatisfactory results (13%) and one good result (7%). As concerns the slip reduction and alfa angle, the best results were achieved by closed reduction and subcapital osteotomy. The FAI was observed/ in 10 patients. Arthrosis was observed as follows: grade I in 8 patients, grade II in 3 patients. The AVN was present as segmental in 4 patients (15%) and as complete in two patients (8%), namely in one after closed reduction and in one after subcapital osteotomy. Dislocations of the hip occurred twice after subcapital osteotomy. Chondrolysis and hip ankylosis were reported in one patient after subcapital osteotomy. DISCUSSION The hypothesis was confirmed because the results of treatment of severe slips without hip dislocation are comparable with procedures using the surgical hip dislocation. The results correspond with large published cohorts of patients in terms of correction as well as the rate of complications. CONCLUSIONS The best results were achieved by closed reduction of acute slips where no complications were present. Subcapital osteotomy without surgical dislocation is comparable with modified osteotomy with surgical hip dislocation. Intertrochanteric osteotomy represents an efficient method in treating grade II slips. Transphyseal fixation without slip correction cannot be recommended in treating severe slips. Key words: slipped capital femoral epiphysis, severe grades of slip, subcapital femoral osteotomy, intertrochanteric femoral osteotomy, closed reduction of slip.
研究目的 评估急性和慢性重度股骨头骨骺滑脱的治疗结果。所检验的假设是,其结果将与采用手术性髋关节脱位的方法相当。材料与方法 在1996年至2014年期间,26例患者接受了重度滑脱(>60°)的治疗。男性居多(2:1),平均年龄更大(平均年龄13.8岁对12岁)。慢性稳定型滑脱居多(16例患者),其次是慢性急性型滑脱(7例患者)和急性滑脱(3例患者)。急性不稳定型滑脱采用闭合复位和经骨骺固定治疗。慢性急性型滑脱分别采用闭合复位和固定(2例患者)以及股骨头下截骨术(5例患者)治疗。慢性滑脱的治疗如下:采用股骨头下截骨术(10例患者);采用股骨转子间截骨术(5例患者);以及采用未经矫正的经骨骺固定(1例患者)。22例患者在对侧同时接受治疗以预防或治疗滑脱。随访时间为20个月至13年。临床结果根据四个评分进行评估:1)我们自己基于活动度降低、肢体缩短和活动受限的评分(NB评分);2)Merle d'Aubigne评分;3)Harris髋关节评分(HHS);4)非关节炎性髋关节评分(NAHS)。在影像学评估中,观察了滑脱角、α角的矫正情况、缺血性坏死(AVN)以及根据Toennis分级的关节炎情况。结果 根据NB评分,获得10例优秀结果(38%)、11例非常好的结果(42%)、1例良好结果和1例满意结果(4%)以及3例不满意结果(11%)。根据其他评分报告了以下结果:a)优秀:D'Aubigne - Postel评分 - 19例(73%);HHS评分 - 20例(77%);NAHS评分 - 21例(81%),b)良好:D'Aubigne评分和HHS评分 - 3例(11%);NAHS评分 - 2例(8%),c)满意:D'Aubigne评分 - 1例(4%),HHS评分和NAHS评分为0,d)不满意:D'Aubigne评分、HHS评分和NAHS评分 - 3例(11%)。手术方法的评估表明,急性滑脱闭合复位取得了最佳结果(优秀结果占80%)。未经复位的经骨骺固定结果仅为满意。股骨转子间截骨术大多取得非常好的结果(80%),然后是优秀结果(20%)。股骨头下截骨术后,大多报告为优秀和非常好的结果(各占40%),其次是2例不满意结果(13%)和1例良好结果(7%)。关于滑脱复位和α角,闭合复位和股骨头下截骨术取得了最佳结果。在10例患者中观察到股骨髋臼撞击症(FAI)。观察到的关节炎情况如下:I级8例患者,II级3例患者。AVN表现为节段性的有4例患者(15%),表现为完全性的有2例患者(8%),即在1例闭合复位后和1例股骨头下截骨术后出现。股骨头下截骨术后发生了2次髋关节脱位。1例患者在股骨头下截骨术后报告有软骨溶解和髋关节强直。讨论 该假设得到证实,因为未进行髋关节脱位的重度滑脱治疗结果与采用手术性髋关节脱位的手术相当。在矫正以及并发症发生率方面,结果与大量已发表的患者队列相符。结论 急性滑脱闭合复位且无并发症时取得了最佳结果。未进行手术脱位的股骨头下截骨术与采用手术性髋关节脱位的改良截骨术相当。股骨转子间截骨术是治疗II级滑脱的有效方法。在治疗重度滑脱时,不推荐未经滑脱矫正的经骨骺固定。关键词:股骨头骨骺滑脱,重度滑脱分级,股骨头下股骨截骨术,股骨转子间截骨术,滑脱闭合复位