Dunlosky John, Thiede Keith W
University of North Carolina, Greensboro, North Carolina, USA.
Mem Cognit. 2004 Jul;32(5):779-88. doi: 10.3758/bf03195868.
The shift-to-easier-materials (STEM) effect occurs when individuals adopt a low performance goal and subsequently select to restudy more easier items of a list than the difficult ones. The causes and constraints of the STEM effect were investigated across four experiments in which participants first briefly studied and judged their learning of 30 paired associates. They were then instructed to obtain a low performance goal and were asked to select items for restudy. The STEM effect was present when items were presented for selection simultaneously, but when items were presented for selection sequentially, the participants instead selected the more difficult items. The presence and absence of STEM effects were linked to planning that was triggered by the simultaneous format and to difficulties in executing an appropriate plan under the sequential format, respectively. Moreover, the STEM effect was evident for individuals with high memory spans but not for those with low memory spans. These and other findings highlight the contribution of planning and capacity constraints to the control of study time.
当个体采用低绩效目标并随后选择重新学习列表中比难的项目更容易的项目时,就会出现转向更容易材料(STEM)效应。在四项实验中研究了STEM效应的原因和制约因素,在这些实验中,参与者首先简要学习并判断他们对30对联想词的学习情况。然后,他们被指示设定一个低绩效目标,并被要求选择要重新学习的项目。当项目同时呈现以供选择时,STEM效应存在,但当项目按顺序呈现以供选择时,参与者反而选择了更难的项目。STEM效应的出现和不出现分别与由同时呈现格式引发的计划以及在顺序呈现格式下执行适当计划的困难有关。此外,STEM效应在高记忆广度的个体中明显,但在低记忆广度的个体中不明显。这些以及其他发现突出了计划和能力限制对学习时间控制的作用。