Suppr超能文献

一维通量理论与二维水动力二次沉淀池模型的比较。

Comparison of the 1D flux theory with a 2D hydrodynamic secondary settling tank model.

作者信息

Ekama G A, Marais P

机构信息

Water Research Group, Department of Civil Engineering, University of Cape Town, Rondebosch, 7701, Cape, South Africa.

出版信息

Water Sci Technol. 2004;50(7):195-204.

Abstract

The applicability of the 1D idealized flux theory (1DFT) for design of secondary settling tanks (SSTs) is evaluated by comparing its predicted maximum surface overflow (SOR) and solids loading (SLR) rates with that calculated from the 2D hydrodynamic model SettlerCAD using as a basis 35 full scale SST stress tests conducted on different SSTs with diameters from 30 to 45m and 2.25 to 4.1 m side water depth, with and without Stamford baffles. From the simulations, a relatively consistent pattern appeared, i.e. that the 1DFT can be used for design but its predicted maximum SLR needs to be reduced by an appropriate flux rating, the magnitude of which depends mainly on SST depth and hydraulic loading rate (HLR). Simulations of the sloping bottom shallow (1.5-2.5 m SWD) Dutch SSTs tested by STOWa and the Watts et al. SST, all with doubled SWDs, and the Darvill new (4.1 m) and old (2.5 m) SSTs with interchanged depths, were run to confirm the sensitivity of the flux rating to depth and HLR. Simulations with and without a Stamford baffle were also done. While the design of the internal features of the SST, such as baffling, have a marked influence on the effluent SS concentration for underloaded SSTs, these features appeared to have only a small influence on the flux rating, i.e. capacity, of the SST, In the meantime until more information is obtained, it would appear that from the simulations so far that the flux rating of 0.80 of the 1DFT maximum SLR recommended by Ekama and Marais remains a reasonable value to apply in the design of full scale SSTs--for deep SSTs (4 m SWD) the flux rating could be increased to 0.85 and for shallow SSTs (2.5 m SWD) decreased to 0.75. It is recommended that (i) while the apparent interrelationship between SST flux rating and depth suggests some optimization of the volume of the SST, that this be avoided and that (ii) the depth of the SST be designed independently of the surface area as is usually the practice and once selected, the appropriate flux rating is applied to the 1DFT estimate of the surface area.

摘要

通过将一维理想化通量理论(1DFT)预测的最大表面溢流率(SOR)和固体负荷率(SLR)与基于35次全尺寸二次沉淀池(SST)应力测试计算得出的结果进行比较,评估了1DFT在二次沉淀池设计中的适用性。这些测试在不同直径(30至45米)和不同边水深(2.25至4.1米)、有或没有斯坦福折流板的二次沉淀池上进行。通过模拟,出现了一种相对一致的模式,即1DFT可用于设计,但预测的最大SLR需要通过适当的通量率进行降低,通量率的大小主要取决于二次沉淀池的深度和水力负荷率(HLR)。对STOWa测试的倾斜底部浅(1.5至2.5米边水深)荷兰二次沉淀池、Watts等人的二次沉淀池(边水深均加倍)以及深度互换的Darvill新(4.1米)和旧(2.5米)二次沉淀池进行了模拟,以确认通量率对深度和HLR的敏感性。还进行了有无斯坦福折流板的模拟。虽然二次沉淀池内部特征(如折流板)的设计对负荷不足的二次沉淀池的出水悬浮固体浓度有显著影响,但这些特征对二次沉淀池的通量率(即容量)似乎只有很小的影响。同时,在获得更多信息之前,从目前的模拟来看,Ekama和Marais推荐的1DFT最大SLR的通量率0.80在全尺寸二次沉淀池设计中似乎仍然是一个合理的值——对于深二次沉淀池(4米边水深),通量率可提高到0.85,对于浅二次沉淀池(2.5米边水深),通量率可降低到0.75。建议:(i)虽然二次沉淀池通量率与深度之间明显的相互关系表明二次沉淀池体积存在一定优化空间,但应避免这种优化;(ii)二次沉淀池的深度应像通常做法那样独立于表面积进行设计,一旦选定,将适当的通量率应用于1DFT对表面积的估算。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验