Alho A, Benterud J G, Høgevold H E, Ekeland A, Strømsøe K
Orthopaedic Department, Ulevaal Hospital, University of Oslo, Norway.
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1992 Apr(277):243-50.
Thirty-five displaced tibial shaft fractures, treated with functional bracing were compared with 43 similar fractures, treated with locked intramedullary nailing. There were 22 excellent/good results in the brace group and 38 in the nail group. There was one infection in the brace group and three in the nailed group. There were five delayed unions and two nonunions in the brace group and one delayed union in the nail group. The functional results in the nailed group were better than the braced group but locked intramedullary nailing of tibial shaft fractures require special resources and training. Locked intramedullary nailing fullfils all the functional criteria for acceptable fracture care.
对35例采用功能支具治疗的胫骨干移位骨折患者与43例采用带锁髓内钉治疗的类似骨折患者进行了比较。支具组有22例获得优/良结果,髓内钉组有38例。支具组有1例感染,髓内钉组有3例。支具组有5例延迟愈合和2例骨不连,髓内钉组有1例延迟愈合。髓内钉组的功能结果优于支具组,但胫骨干骨折的带锁髓内钉治疗需要特殊资源和培训。带锁髓内钉满足了可接受的骨折治疗的所有功能标准。