Suppr超能文献

功能性支具与带锁髓内钉治疗胫骨干骨折的疗效比较

Comparison of functional bracing and locked intramedullary nailing in the treatment of displaced tibial shaft fractures.

作者信息

Alho A, Benterud J G, Høgevold H E, Ekeland A, Strømsøe K

机构信息

Orthopaedic Department, Ulevaal Hospital, University of Oslo, Norway.

出版信息

Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1992 Apr(277):243-50.

PMID:1555348
Abstract

Thirty-five displaced tibial shaft fractures, treated with functional bracing were compared with 43 similar fractures, treated with locked intramedullary nailing. There were 22 excellent/good results in the brace group and 38 in the nail group. There was one infection in the brace group and three in the nailed group. There were five delayed unions and two nonunions in the brace group and one delayed union in the nail group. The functional results in the nailed group were better than the braced group but locked intramedullary nailing of tibial shaft fractures require special resources and training. Locked intramedullary nailing fullfils all the functional criteria for acceptable fracture care.

摘要

对35例采用功能支具治疗的胫骨干移位骨折患者与43例采用带锁髓内钉治疗的类似骨折患者进行了比较。支具组有22例获得优/良结果,髓内钉组有38例。支具组有1例感染,髓内钉组有3例。支具组有5例延迟愈合和2例骨不连,髓内钉组有1例延迟愈合。髓内钉组的功能结果优于支具组,但胫骨干骨折的带锁髓内钉治疗需要特殊资源和培训。带锁髓内钉满足了可接受的骨折治疗的所有功能标准。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验