Bo Tao, Liu Huwei
Key Laboratory of Bioorganic Chemistry and Molecular Engineering of Ministry of Education, College of Chemistry and Molecular Engineering, Peking University, Beijing 100871, PR China.
J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci. 2004 Dec 5;812(1-2):165-74. doi: 10.1016/j.jchromb.2004.08.009.
Xanthones, as a kind of polyphenolic natural products with many strong bioactivities, are attractive for separation scientists due to the similarity and diversity of their structures resulting in difficult separation by chromatographic methods. High performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) and thin layer chromatography (TLC) are traditional methods to separate xanthones. Recently, capillary electrophoresis (CE), as a micro-column technique driven by electroosmotic flow (EOF), with its high efficiency and high-speed separation, has been employed to separate xanthones and determine their physicochemical properties such as binding constants with cyclodextrin (CD) and ionization constants. Since xanthones have been used in clinic treatment, the development of chromatographic and CE methods for the separation and determination of xanthones plays an essential role in the quality control of some herbal medicines containing xanthones. This article reviewed the separation of xanthones by HPLC, TLC and CE, citing 72 literatures. This review focused on the CE separation for xanthones due to its unique advantages compared to chromatographic methods. The comparison of separation selectivity of different CE modes including capillary zone electrophoresis (CZE), micellar electrokinetic chromatography (MEKC), microemulsion electrokinetic capillary chromatography (MEEKC) and capillary electrochromatography (CEC) was discussed. Compared with traditional chromatographic methods such as HPLC and TLC, CE has higher separation efficiency, faster separation, lower cost and more flexible modes. However, because of low sensitivity of UV detector and low contents of xanthones in herbal medicines, CE methods have seldom been applied to the analysis of real samples although CE showed great potential for xanthone separation. The determination of xanthones in herbal medicines has been often achieved by HPLC. Hence, how to enhance CE detection sensitivity for real sample analysis, e.g. by on-line preconcentration and CE-MS, would be a key to achieve the quantitation of xanthones.
氧杂蒽酮作为一类具有多种强大生物活性的多酚类天然产物,因其结构的相似性和多样性导致采用色谱方法分离困难,故而吸引了分离科学家的关注。高效液相色谱(HPLC)和薄层色谱(TLC)是分离氧杂蒽酮的传统方法。近年来,毛细管电泳(CE)作为一种由电渗流(EOF)驱动的微柱技术,凭借其高效、高速的分离性能,已被用于分离氧杂蒽酮并测定其物理化学性质,如与环糊精(CD)的结合常数和电离常数。由于氧杂蒽酮已应用于临床治疗,开发用于分离和测定氧杂蒽酮的色谱和CE方法在含氧杂蒽酮的某些草药质量控制中起着至关重要的作用。本文综述了采用HPLC、TLC和CE分离氧杂蒽酮的情况,引用文献72篇。由于与色谱方法相比具有独特优势,本综述重点关注了CE对氧杂蒽酮的分离。讨论了不同CE模式(包括毛细管区带电泳(CZE)、胶束电动色谱(MEKC)、微乳液电动毛细管色谱(MEEKC)和毛细管电色谱(CEC))分离选择性的比较。与HPLC和TLC等传统色谱方法相比,CE具有更高的分离效率、更快的分离速度、更低的成本和更灵活的模式。然而,由于紫外检测器灵敏度较低以及草药中氧杂蒽酮含量较低,尽管CE在氧杂蒽酮分离方面显示出巨大潜力,但CE方法很少应用于实际样品分析。草药中氧杂蒽酮的测定通常通过HPLC实现。因此,如何提高CE对实际样品分析的检测灵敏度,例如通过在线预富集和CE-MS,将是实现氧杂蒽酮定量的关键。